Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell WHO WILL WIN

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BadNewz
    Interim Champion
    • Jun 2008
    • 889
    • 105
    • 0
    • 7,016

    #21


    Froch-Dirrell: “I Will be standing in the ring with the belt at the end” – Andre

    By Scott Gilfoid: Carl Froch is going to be in for the fight of his life on October 17th, when he meets up with Andre Dirrell, in Froch’s home city of Nottingham. Its really too bad that the fight is taking place in Nottingham, and not in Dirrell’s home city of Flint, Michigan, because it may be difficult for Froch to experience being beaten in front of his home crowd. At least if the fight took place in another city or country, Froch wouldn’t have to suffer the likely embarrassment that this fight will bring for him if Dirrell beats him as bad as I think he will.

    Dirrell, 27, an unbeaten Bronze Medalist for the United States in the 2004, is determined to go into Nottingham and ruin Froch’s world. In their conference call on Wednesday, Dirrell said “I will be standing in the ring with the belt at the end.” Dirrell has no qualms about fighting Froch in his home city and is ready to go over and snatch the victory, and with it Froch’s World Boxing Council super middleweight title in the first bout of the Super Six tournament.

    Froch sees himself, along with WBA super middleweight champion Mikkel Kessler, as the two fighters that will emerge at the top of the heap in the Super Six tourney. But Dirrell will have something to say about that. Dirrell is faster, stronger and superior to any fighter that Froch has fought in his career, better even than former middleweight champion Jermain Taylor, who Froch went life and death with in his last bout in April 2009.

    Froch was losing the fight going into the 12th round and needed a knockout to win, because he had been knocked down and dominated by Taylor in the fight. Froch was able to pull out a victory with a knockout with 14 seconds left in the fight, but he looked very vulnerable throughout.

    The fact that Froch struggled with Taylor, a fighter that many boxing fans see as shot, isn’t something that makes Froch look good. Whether Froch want’s to acknowledge it or not, he was getting handled by a fighter that has struggled in the past couple of years, losing two fights against what many people see as a badly flawed middleweight, Kelly Pavlik.

    Froch was getting handled by Taylor, and made to look like embarrassingly slow by comparison. Given that it took a knockout in the last fourteen seconds to get the win over Taylor, seems to suggest that Froch isn’t as good as some boxing experts – and bookies – like to think he is. Froch says that bookies have installed him as a favorite to win the tourney.

    I find that astonishing, because it tells me that the bookies need to brush up on their boxing knowledge and take a good look at Froch’s fights against Taylor and Jean Pascal, and rethink their choice. Froch looked wide open defensively in both fights and was hit pretty much nonstop by Pascal and Taylor until they both tired out from throwing punches.

    Both are good fighters, but limited in terms of stamina. Had Pascal and Taylor’s stamina held out, Froch would be watching the Super Six tourney on television rather than participating in it because he was getting served up royally by both of them.

    Froch isn’t going to win the Super Six tourney, believe me. He’s going to get beat first by Dirrell and then by Kessler. At that point, it won’t matter if Froch wins his third bout in the group I competition because he likely won’t have enough points to make it to the next level.

    Comment

    • BadNewz
      Interim Champion
      • Jun 2008
      • 889
      • 105
      • 0
      • 7,016

      #22
      Originally posted by daggum
      well most of the brits think calzaghe beat hopkins so probably yea
      Shameful how much impact those two racist judges had on history.

      Comment

      • Яша
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 323
        • 22
        • 5
        • 385

        #23
        I think Froch by late ko. Froch is PROVEN, Dirrell is NOT. who has Dirrell beat??? Froch has beaten Pascal and Taylor, both of them are better and thougher than Dirrell.

        that said, If Direll wins I will give him the full respect he deserves. if Froch wins he won't get any respect from the americans...

        Comment

        • Freddy Krueger
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 5596
          • 159
          • 213
          • 6,618

          #24
          Originally posted by BadNewz
          Shameful how much impact those two racist judges had on history.
          Yeah, because Hopkins was constantly landing his head in calzaghes face. I forgot how many punches Hopkins landed on Calzaghe he landed so many to earn all the rounds to dominate Calzaghe./Sarcasm for your slow ass The only one who is racist here is you, not the judges in that fight.

          Comment

          • El Angel
            Team Cotto
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Aug 2009
            • 20795
            • 495
            • 382
            • 29,430

            #25
            Froch is big step up for Dirrell, too big a step up this fast IMO. I think his pressure will put Dirrell on the defensive, which won't win him a decsion in Nottingham. Froch by late TKO or decsion.

            Comment

            • alexpz
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 24237
              • 302
              • 245
              • 32,138

              #26
              Froch will be to much for Dirrell

              Comment

              • flyest1
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 1691
                • 17
                • 0
                • 8,166

                #27
                Dirrell is ready for the step up. Same with Ward if you ask me. If they didn't believe they would win these fights or Tourney. They would have never signed up for it. Much credit for both of those cats for even getting in this tourney. I just hope Kessler and Froch arent overlooking these youngters. From recent interviews,it looks like Froch things Dirrell will be easy and has his sights on Froch.

                Comment

                • SCtrojansbaby
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 5960
                  • 136
                  • 72
                  • 12,653

                  #28
                  Dirrell is the far far far superior athlete. And is a careful fighter un**** Pascal. Froch is one of the worst defensive fighters I have ever seen, anything Dirrell throws will land.


                  Dirrell wins a dominant decision although the judges will score it close.

                  Comment

                  • FasTHarD
                    <div style=
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 14820
                    • 337
                    • 294
                    • 21,796

                    #29
                    Dirrell by UD. That speed baby.

                    Comment

                    • Allucard
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 5979
                      • 393
                      • 56
                      • 12,399

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Infern0
                      Come on guys get your picks in, who will win and by which method?
                      I like Dirrell but he's definitely the underdog here. Experience-wise they shouldn't even been fighting but Dirrell is one confident sob and for that best of luck to him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP