Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell WHO WILL WIN

**Sick/** · 10-04-2009, 07:03 PM

Originally posted by Infern0

Come on guys get your picks in, who will win and by which method?

I don't know but maybe carl by late tko

**Gorgeous George** · 10-04-2009, 07:05 PM

Carl has this in the bag.

**NakiFan** · 10-04-2009, 07:07 PM

Let it be known I pick Froch by KO

**Freddy Krueger** · 10-04-2009, 07:08 PM

Originally posted by Infern0

Let it be known I pick Froch by KO

Is their any other way he can win if its not by KO?

**NakiFan** · 10-04-2009, 07:12 PM

Originally posted by Gary Smith

Is their any other way he can win if its not by KO?

Yeah he can win a decision, If Dirrell gets on his bike and tries to Curtis Stevens his way to victory the british judges will be scoring rounds to Froch on Agression.

**Freddy Krueger** · 10-04-2009, 07:13 PM

Originally posted by Infern0

Yeah he can win a decision, If Dirrell gets on his bike and tries to Curtis Stevens his way to victory the british judges will be scoring rounds to Froch on Agression.

What about who lands the most punches per round? Then it goes to Dirrell, unless british boxing wants to rip off Dirrells deserved victory. By the way you type, it makes me think you think Stevens deserved the win for missing his punches.

**NakiFan** · 10-04-2009, 07:17 PM

Originally posted by Gary Smith

What about who lands the most punches per round? Then it goes to Dirrell, unless british boxing wants to rip off Dirrells deserved victory. By the way you type, it makes me think you think Stevens deserved the win for missing his punches.

Dirrell may land slightly more shots, but he will be getting cut off and eating more effective shots from Froch. Carl is half a foot taller than stevens and knows how to cut off the ring better. If Dirrell wins a clear decision he will get the nod, but if he runs away for 12 rounds landing nothing meaningful and getting tagged with solid punches he will not.

**NakiFan** · 10-04-2009, 07:25 PM

Currently at 6-4 Dirrell

**daggum** · 10-04-2009, 07:43 PM

Originally posted by Gary Smith

What about who lands the most punches per round? Then it goes to Dirrell, unless british boxing wants to rip off Dirrells deserved victory. By the way you type, it makes me think you think Stevens deserved the win for missing his punches.

well most of the brits think calzaghe beat hopkins so probably yea

Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell WHO WILL WIN