Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would Mike Tyson be better or worst if he was 6’2 with a 77 inch wingspan?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would Mike Tyson be better or worst if he was 6’2 with a 77 inch wingspan?

    Would Mike Tyson be better or worst if he was bigger ?

  • #2
    bigger probably better

    he said he wanted to be a bigger guy to give guys bigger beatings

    Comment


    • #3
      What would be if my uncle had pu$$y with ultra pubic hair?
      WillieWild114 WillieWild114 likes this.

      Comment


      • #4
        A lot of his power came from how short and compact his punches were.
        He was a unique guy at heavyweight.
        Charlie Zelenoff Charlie Zelenoff likes this.

        Comment


        • #5
          Being a dwarf is a ton of work, so yes. It would’ve been a lot easier for him at heavyweight.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
            Being a dwarf is a ton of work, so yes. It wouldâve been a lot easier for him at heavyweight.
            He was a shorter heavyweight but no dwarf

            Comment


            • #7
              probably worse

              tall guys aren't built to use that style
              Charlie Zelenoff Charlie Zelenoff likes this.

              Comment


              • #8
                Mike Tyson in his prime he didn't need size....he come undeneith and attack...he was the type of fighter than needed height... If he was taller he'd have had to change his style.....peekaboo style was perfect for Mike to fight taller opponents.....

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP