Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dubois's punch was below the navel...pics

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dubois's punch was below the navel...pics

    You can actually see Usyk's navel in this pic just before the fight resumes...

    Untitled 1.jpg
    Here's the video time marked at 20:37...also check out 18:48 where Usyk takes a deep beath and his navel goes from being covered to exposed. Anything at all just below the beltline would have been low because Usyk's belt was NOT lifted high like a lot of fighters wear it, and the ref knew that.

    's navel in this pic


    Here's the punch...

    Untitled2.jpg

    Here’s the video time marked at 0:29



    He hit him below the navel. The ref has a clear view of it and waves it off immediately.
    Last edited by jaded; 08-27-2023, 01:16 AM.

  • #2
    You failed to mention the first image Usyk had clearly moved his shorts down they are much higher in the other footage

    Usyk was the better fighter by a long way but that was a legal blow for me higher than Crawford vs Khan and Ward vs Kov both declared as victory
    Leicesterage Combat Talk Radio likes this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by davef View Post
      You failed to mention the first image Usyk had clearly moved his shorts down they are much higher in the other footage

      Usyk was the better fighter by a long way but that was a legal blow for me higher than Crawford vs Khan and Ward vs Kov both declared as victory
      Show me that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Imagine the controversy if the ref scored it a knockdown, Usyk couldn't make the count and they'd awarded the fight to Dubois.

        No way would that have been fair or tolerated. Carnage and bloodshed would have erupted in that arena.

        The better man won and the ref called it as he saw it.

        This was no robbery. Dubois wasn't cheated. Fisheyes can protest all he likes but there's no way Dubois deserves another shot.

        Back of the line for DDD...

        Comment


        • #5
          Show you what? If you mean Usyk shorts you have all the footage?

          The ward Crawford fights are on YouTube

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by davef View Post
            You failed to mention the first image Usyk had clearly moved his shorts down they are much higher in the other footage

            Usyk was the better fighter by a long way but that was a legal blow for me higher than Crawford vs Khan and Ward vs Kov both declared as victory
            Every low blow that's ever been thrown is higher than Ward's fight ending low blows on Kovalev.

            Comment


            • #7
              DDD is the rightful champion. He knocked out Usyk. this is a fact.

              the only way you support usyk is if you support crooked officiating. it was a screwjob of the highest order.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by davef View Post
                Show you what? If you mean Usyk shorts you have all the footage?

                The ward Crawford fights are on YouTube
                You said he pulled his shorts down...and I suppose his protector too then. Show me. I didn't see do either.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Screenshot_20230827_061402_**********
                  Originally posted by jaded View Post

                  You said he pulled his shorts down...and I suppose his protector too then. Show me. I didn't see do either.
                  You have all the footage though yourself check when he is recovering and adjusting his shorts about 20 times after the air got ****** out of him and not only that you can clearly with your own eyes see the difference in height of them between the shot and the first image

                  EDIT- yea navel not visible here and is in the first image and seems to me although borderline it was legal since the hit directly there
                  Last edited by davef; 08-27-2023, 12:21 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    no controversy at all, clearly a low blow

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP