Comments Thread For: Ugas-Barrios WBC Interim Title Fight To Be Part Of Canelo-Charlo Showtime PPV Card

[Inoue Body Shot]

The Canelo vs Charlo undercard is great!!!

[Doubledagger]

There's no truth here.

Berto was majorly fading by the time Floyd fought him. Berto had just won the INTERIM WBA title. Keith was holding the WBA regular belt.

He didn't duck a fight with Spence, he unified the division and fought Shawn Porter.

And let's drop the "winner gets Floyd" bull****, that's not how the fight game works lol

Floyd was the WBA super Champion, which means Thurman was just a glorified number one contender with a trinket.

He was not recognised as the WBA champ until Floyd retired and vacated his WBA belt, same way Ugas wasn't recognised until he beat the Super Champ, Manny, same way Manny wasn't recognized until he beat Thurman.

You can't hide from the truth.

Keith was given a free shot at the title and to earn the sweepstakes but didn't want take it because he didn't want to EARN the shot.

Which is the EXACT same reason he has no fight lined up now, because he don't wana earn nothing. He wants freebies.

Look at Ugas. Ugas beat the guy who beat Thurman, and was in a huge ppv event with Spence to unify titles.

But Ugas is willing to fight on the undercard of Jermell vs Canelo to work his way back.

Thurman meanwhile just wants to TALK his way back.

[Doubledagger]

The truth is simple, Mayweather ducked Thurman for an easier fight. It doesn't matter when Berto was a champion because he had been badly beaten by Guerrero and Soto. Thurman made lightwork of both those names and was clearly on the rise, so don't lie like Berto was a marquee name because he wasn't. Clearly evident by the poor numbers against Mayweather.

Thurman wasn't a prospect but the number one contender for Mayweather's title, that's the truth. Stop with the mental gymnastics, a duck is a duck. Thurman had every right to a Mayweather opportunity so cut the made up scenarios.

Okay, a duck is a duck yeah?

Thurman ducked Spence for a shot at the title and a shot at Mayweather.

Can't wait to hear your hypocrisy.

Cause if Mayweather ducked Thurman, then Thurman DEFINIETLY ducked Spence.

He wasn't injured, he was available, the title was going to be made available, all and Mayweather was gonna fight him if he beat Spence.

Everything was on the platter.

So he why he not take the fight?

DUCK!

Or does that word only work when it's Mayweather?

Lol, for your information Spence wasn't a prospect either goofy.

He was Tim Bradley's mandatory for the WBO, which makes him a top contender.

Now let me sit back and watch you have a brain fit while you try to jump through hoops fo justify this trash fighter

[Bronx2245]

At this point, I'd say Boots would get more credit for beating Stanionis than Keith. Maybe if Keith beat somebody credible in fine fashion in the next couple of months that would change.

I think Stanionis is a legit threat, but as I said, MARK MY WORDS! If Boots beats up Stanionis, the narrative will quickly change to "Stanionis only had 14 fights, never bet anyone, blah, blah, blah!"

[unknowledgeablepugilist]

Okay, a duck is a duck yeah?

Thurman ducked Spence for a shot at the title and a shot at Mayweather.

Can't wait to hear your hypocrisy.

Cause if Mayweather ducked Thurman, then Thurman DEFINIETLY ducked Spence.

He wasn't injured, he was available, the title was going to be made available, all and Mayweather was gonna fight him if he beat Spence.

Everything was on the platter.

So he why he not take the fight?

DUCK!

Or does that word only work when it's Mayweather?

Lol, for your information Spence wasn't a prospect either goofy.

He was Tim Bradley's mandatory for the WBO, which makes him a top contender.

Now let me sit back and watch you have a brain fit while you try to jump through hoops fo justify this trash fighter

How did Thurman duck Spence, when he was Mayweather's mandatory?

"Thurman has been the WBA's No. 1-ranked welterweight contender since Aug. 3, 2013, so by the time the Mayweather-Maidana winner could fight again, that winner would be obligated to fight Thurman, unless exempted by the sanctioning body" (Mlive, May. 02, 2014)


Thurman was the mandatory for a year. Spence wasn't mandatory yet, could you actually provide the exact date Spence was ordered to fight Bradley?

Furthermore, Mayweather never said he'd fight the winner of Spence Vs Thurman. In fact I remember Porter being involved too. So maybe I've seen the wrong quote's could you provide a date ?

"Mayweather has rejected the idea of facing either of them - but he does offer both of them the ability to secure a top position on the undercard - against Spence" (Boxingscence, Jun 22, 2015)

Mayweather ducked Thurman for Berto & Thurman wasn't guaranteed anything for fighting Spence outside of a title, which he was mandated for. Either your dumb or just ignorant but I know one thing for sure you're a clown.

[Doubledagger]

How did Thurman duck Spence, when he was Mayweather's mandatory?

"Thurman has been the WBA's No. 1-ranked welterweight contender since Aug. 3, 2013, so by the time the Mayweather-Maidana winner could fight again, that winner would be obligated to fight Thurman, unless exempted by the sanctioning body" (Mlive, May. 02, 2014)


Thurman was the mandatory for a year. Spence wasn't mandatory yet, could you actually provide the exact date Spence was ordered to fight Bradley?

Furthermore, Mayweather never said he'd fight the winner of Spence Vs Thurman. In fact I remember Porter being involved too. So maybe I've seen the wrong quote's could you provide a date ?

"Mayweather has rejected the idea of facing either of them - but he does offer both of them the ability to secure a top position on the undercard - against Spence" (Boxingscence, Jun 22, 2015)

Mayweather ducked Thurman for Berto & Thurman wasn't guaranteed anything for fighting Spence outside of a title, which he was mandated for. Either your dumb or just ignorant but I know one thing for sure you're a clown.

https://www.************.com/2015/07...im-10-million/

Your boy asked for ten million to fight Errol Spence on Mayweather's undercard

Didn't he also ask for ten million when he was ducking Crawford? Or do you have amnesia about that too? Lol

https://www.boxingscene.com/thurman-...opular--139412

Yo boy ducked again claiming Spence is not as popular as him even though Spence wrnt on ppv before him and Spence had 6 million viewers, the highest ever, for his fights with Bundu.


https://www.boxingscene.com/thurman-...-spence--93439

This yo boy saying he wants Khan instead of Spence.

Worst part is that he admits he sounds like Floyd when Floyd is talking about him, in other words, the guy you defending literally kicked you in the mouth for saying Floyd ducked but he didn't duck.

The dude calls Floyd a duck for not fighting him, and ADMITS immediately after that he is doing the same thing Floyd is doing.

But Floyd ducking and Keith aint ducking huh?

You sir are a dirty hypocrite.

Go to sleep boy

[unknowledgeablepugilist]

https://www.************.com/2015/07...im-10-million/

Your boy asked for ten million to fight Errol Spence on Mayweather's undercard

Didn't he also ask for ten million when he was ducking Crawford? Or do you have amnesia about that too? Lol

https://www.boxingscene.com/thurman-...opular--139412

Yo boy ducked again claiming Spence is not as popular as him even though Spence wrnt on ppv before him and Spence had 6 million viewers, the highest ever, for his fights with Bundu.


https://www.boxingscene.com/thurman-...-spence--93439

This yo boy saying he wants Khan instead of Spence.

Worst part is that he admits he sounds like Floyd when Floyd is talking about him, in other words, the guy you defending literally kicked you in the mouth for saying Floyd ducked but he didn't duck.

The dude calls Floyd a duck for not fighting him, and ADMITS immediately after that he is doing the same thing Floyd is doing.

But Floyd ducking and Keith aint ducking huh?

You sir are a dirty hypocrite.

Go to sleep boy

Do you understand what we are talking about? I am not arguing Thurman has never ducked anyone. I am arguing that Thurman does not need to earn a Mayweather fight because Thurman was the mandatory, there was no guarantee facing Spence earned a fight against Mayweather, and Berto was an easier option compared to Thurman due to one being on the slide, while the other was on the rise.

You have not been able to refute those main points, instead you are going on a tangent about things not relevant to the situation. Thurman has avoided opportunities against Spence and Crawford; his inactivity has negatively affected his career. I will not deny any of those facts - the Thurman vs Spence fight should of happened especially with both men holding titles but that's a different situation to the one being debated. I do not understand if you are slow or dumb but if you want to debate something at least be precise you imbecile. Here's a tip provide information relevant to issue; that is something you should of learned in school.