Wilder is worth 48 million USD and Joshua is worth 97 million. They are two of the very best of the 21st century, and this fight is for PRIDE!
Joshua, 33 is smack dab in the middle of his Prime!
And the "Washed up" blather comes from fans still shook from the Ruiz KO loss and the two Patty-Cake decisions that went against him with Usyk, which they STILL struggle to explain. As if they want to beleive that "The Joshua who beat up Molina and Cornish would never lose to Usyk".
Sure he would. The Anthony Joshua that you THOUGHT existed wouldn't have, sure; but the real one could and did stumble against both Ruiz and Usyk. Doesn't mean Joshua's no good mind you; it just means he's not the only heavyweight who is good.
Wilder, 37 is later prime, but PRIME. Make no mistake. Casuals often don't know that the Bronze Bomber didn't start boxing until he was 20, rather later; turning pro at 23. His trilogy with Fury was decisive, but in TWO of those fights Wilder FOUR TIMES came within a referee's call of scoring a knockout where Tyson Fury survived by a wisper. These fights, although wearing, were epics, not one-sided beatings.
I think that Both fighters are coming off one of the better wins of their careers, in fact.
Afterall, who's Joshua ever beaten who's better than Helenius?
Whyte, Klitschko, Povetkin and Ruiz - 4 guys.
Martin, Breazeale, Takam, Parker and Pulev are of the same level as "The Nordic Nightmare", not better.
And Wilder?
Ortiz I, Ortiz II, Fury I, Fury II, Fury III - 5 guys.
Breazeale, Washington, Stiverne, Scott, Duhaupas and Arreola are the same level.
Both remain at the tip-top of the World Rankings of the flagship division of the MONEY combat sport.
The two former titleholders are NOT past prime....and when you hear that, you're hearing it from a casual who's forming and posting their opinions.
Let the Fireworks Begin.
This fight is HARDLY too late to be historically meaningful.
Joshua, 33 is smack dab in the middle of his Prime!
And the "Washed up" blather comes from fans still shook from the Ruiz KO loss and the two Patty-Cake decisions that went against him with Usyk, which they STILL struggle to explain. As if they want to beleive that "The Joshua who beat up Molina and Cornish would never lose to Usyk".
Sure he would. The Anthony Joshua that you THOUGHT existed wouldn't have, sure; but the real one could and did stumble against both Ruiz and Usyk. Doesn't mean Joshua's no good mind you; it just means he's not the only heavyweight who is good.
Wilder, 37 is later prime, but PRIME. Make no mistake. Casuals often don't know that the Bronze Bomber didn't start boxing until he was 20, rather later; turning pro at 23. His trilogy with Fury was decisive, but in TWO of those fights Wilder FOUR TIMES came within a referee's call of scoring a knockout where Tyson Fury survived by a wisper. These fights, although wearing, were epics, not one-sided beatings.
I think that Both fighters are coming off one of the better wins of their careers, in fact.
Afterall, who's Joshua ever beaten who's better than Helenius?
Whyte, Klitschko, Povetkin and Ruiz - 4 guys.
Martin, Breazeale, Takam, Parker and Pulev are of the same level as "The Nordic Nightmare", not better.
And Wilder?
Ortiz I, Ortiz II, Fury I, Fury II, Fury III - 5 guys.
Breazeale, Washington, Stiverne, Scott, Duhaupas and Arreola are the same level.
Both remain at the tip-top of the World Rankings of the flagship division of the MONEY combat sport.
The two former titleholders are NOT past prime....and when you hear that, you're hearing it from a casual who's forming and posting their opinions.
Let the Fireworks Begin.
This fight is HARDLY too late to be historically meaningful.
Comment