Comments Thread For: Hearn Notified By Whyte's Legal Team, Unable To Discuss VADA Report Information

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kannabis Kid
    BlackRobb's Step-Dad
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 6202
    • 811
    • 620
    • 40,319

    #11
    Originally posted by Boxing 112

    I have no source that is why i asked for a link (a source) since i saw people claim it in comments online. Like i mention the only tests i know for a fact were all in his bro boxing career. 2012. 2020. 2023.
    Yeah I'm aware of those and like I said it's believable he failed in the past before that but I can't be saying it happened until I know for sure when it comes to that amateur test.

    Comment

    • Bob
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2019
      • 2142
      • 1,098
      • 1,890
      • 28,232

      #12
      Is this under bbboc & ukad? If so expect another year of nonsense.

      Popper's like Whyte should be removed from the sport or remove the testing if its going to be brushed under the carpet after a year if you have the money for a legal team.

      We need set rules globally like the ufc.

      Comment

      • pollywog
        Thrower of Leather
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2018
        • 4117
        • 1,030
        • 565
        • 17,943

        #13
        Juicing or not, I'd still like to see the mighty Oilskin Parker clean Dillian's clock in a rematch.

        Comment

        • chicken-
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 1251
          • 522
          • 27
          • 17,232

          #14
          Originally posted by Boxing 112

          I have heard people say he tested positive in amateurs or kickboxing can someone send a link

          This is his 3rd in pro boxing i know that is a fact

          2012 - failed UKAD test banned 2 years by BBBofc
          Rivas fight - failed, got away with it contamination excuse but even the final report give no facts as to why he got away with it. 2nd failed test should have meant 4 years ban even for strict liability.

          3rd test is now
          He had taken another test 3 days prior to the one he failed for Rivas. They determined the levels found in his system were too low for him to have taken an intentional amount between his test 3 days prior and the positive result test.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP