Comments Thread For: Crawford vs. Inoue: CompuBox Comparison of Performances Using 15 Unique Metrics
Collapse
-
-
Spence and Fulton have very different styles. Those stats should be compared to what their opponents have done on average. It's easy to cherry pick things to make one guy look better than the other. I think they're both great fighters. For your reference, here's some resume comparisons:
Inoue wins:
25-0, 20 wins in title fights. 18 stoppages across those fights (90%). 48% of his fights have been against champs, and 80% have been title fights. 4 division champ across 5 divisions, undisputed and unified.
He has fought 12 champions (counting Donaire twice) and an additional IBO champ who I’m not counting. 56 title defenses among those champs.
Ryoichi Taguchi (unified light flyweight world champ) WBA, IBF, Ring. Inoue gave him his second loss, and Taguchi still went up to win and defend world titles after, going 9-2-1 after fighting Inoue. 18-1-1 at time of fight. One defense.
Adrian Hernandez two time light flyweight world champ. 4 defenses in his second title reign before being stopped by Inoue. 29-2-1, 5 total defenses
Omar Narvaez: two division world champion. 43-1-2, 27 defenses across those reigns.
Kohei Kono: 2 time world champion, 32-9-1, 3 defenses.
Jamie McDonnell: IBF bantamweight, WBA regular bantamweight champion, 29-2-1, 6 defenses.
Juan Carlos Payano: WBA and IBO champion, 20-1, one defense.
Emmanuel Rodriguez: IBF champion, 19-0, one defense, with wins over 2 other champs on this list.
Donaire (twice). Shouldn’t need to go into Donaire’s bonafides, but he reached #3 P4P by Ring, FOY 2012, 4 division world champion, has held 9 world titles, and titles in 3 consecutive decades, along with only Holyfield, Pacman, BHop, Morales, and Floyd. 40-5 at time of first fight, 42-6, 10 defenses across his many reigns.
Jason Moloney: Current WBO bantamweight champ. 21-1
Paul Butler. WBO champ, but no defenses. Email champ. 34-2.
Stephen Fulton: was unified WBC/WBO superbantam champ, 21-0, 2 defenses, both against world champions.
Combined record of his opponents at time of fight: 348-30-6. 90.6% wins.
Bud Crawford wins:
40-0. 17 wins in 17 title fights, 14 stoppages across those fights (82.4%). 25% of his fights have been against champs, and 42.5% have been title fights. 3 division champion, and undisputed in two divisions.
10 champs beaten, 31 defenses between them.
Ricky Burns: 3 division world champion. 36-2-1 at time of fight. 8 defenses.
Yuriorkis Gamboa: unified featherweight champion, 23-0, 5 defenses.
Ray Beltran, 29-6-1: 0 defenses.
Vik Postol, 28-0: 0 defenses
Julius Indongo unified light welter, 22-0: 1 defense
Jeff Horn, 18-0-1 - 1 defense
Amir Khan - unified light welterweight champ. 33-4. 5 defenses
Kell Brook 39-2 - 3 defenses
Shawn Porter- 2 time world champ, 31-3-1: 2 defenses.
Errol Spence Jr - unified world champ, 28-0, 6 defenses.
Combined record of his opponents at time of fight: 287-17-4. 93.2% wins.
I'm personally leading towards Bud being #1 at the moment, but he's at the tail end of his career, and Inoue is still in his prime, and has room to make more statements. They're both impressive as heck, and at the very least I think we can all agree they're the top 2. I think Bud has slightly better wins, but Inoue has faced consistently high level competition, taking on a future world champ in his 4th fight, and winning a world title in his 6th fight, and he's only at 25 fights. We'll see what his career looks like if he gets to 40 fights.
Comment
-
-
It’s a bet now? There was no bet. Don’t make me pull up ur the posts. Ur changing ur story every lost now trying to weasel out of this cause ur mommy didn’t lend u the money LMAOComment
-
I think buds dominating win over spence is the reason the people who think bud is no1, deserves no1. But in a private moment although they probably feel bud would always have beaten spence, in their hearts they know if spence didn't have accident spence would've did better, spence didn't do himself justice that night. So to have bud no1 on that basis isn't gentlemanly more than anything, it's taking advantage of another man's misfortune.
By all means have bud above usy k and Nell if it's that important, as bud was always considered below them too.Last edited by hugh grant; 08-09-2023, 04:45 AM.Comment
-
Remember I challenged You.....
it's a bet
I said I don't believe You were in Vegas...
Prove it & I'll pay you $$$
Now you're talking transaction?
Smart guy this is how transactions work
I have to see what I'm purchasing first buddy even if it's just one picture
You said you have a roll of film from your Vegas Trip right?
Well send one pic first & get paid..
Heh
All these months you thought I lived in the UK
You have mental issues & not very intelligentComment
-
Pull up my Post buddy
Remember I challenged You.....
it's a bet
I said I don't believe You were in Vegas...
Prove it & I'll pay you $$$
Now you're talking transaction?
Smart guy this is how transactions work
I have to see what I'm purchasing first buddy even if it's just one picture
You said you have a roll of film from your Vegas Trip right?
Well send one pic first & get paid..
Heh
All these months you thought I lived in the UK
You have mental issues & not very intelligentComment
-
Nope. Again that’s not how this works. You literally said you’d pay for pictures. Now u want me to send u the pictures without getting paid. Make it make sense lmao. Sending pictures to random liars on the internet is not something I do for less than $1000. Again u just proved anyone who’s read any of this what a clown u are lol
I want You to send One picture
One picture only
Who refuses $ 1000 by withholding a picture that shows being in Vegas @ a Boxing event?
Its not that serious & more importantly it's Not worth anything of value
Me on the other hand have something of value
$1000
The Clown is You
The Clown is the one that doesn't understand how transactions work
If anyone buys an Apple iPhone online or (on the internet according to you)
They have to see it first
That's how transactions work
No one makes a purchase without first examining the product
You test drive a car before purchasing
You try on the pants before you purchase
I want to see what I'm purchasing at least one picture because you have a roll of pictures
Lol
You are a disgrace
Comment
-
Nope
I want You to send One picture
One picture only
Who refuses $ 1000 by withholding a picture that shows being in Vegas @ a Boxing event?
Its not that serious & more importantly it's Not worth anything of value
Me on the other hand have something of value
$1000
The Clown is You
The Clown is the one that doesn't understand how transactions work
If anyone buys an Apple iPhone online or (on the internet according to you)
They have to see it first
That's how transactions work
No one makes a purchase without first examining the product
You test drive a car before purchasing
You try on the pants before you purchase
I want to see what I'm purchasing at least one picture because you have a roll of pictures
Lol
You are a disgrace
Comment
-
Explain....
Your Post makes no sense..
Your Accusations make no sense
As Usual You provide no proof to back up Your Post
And then You call me a known liar?
Lol
All Your Post are lies Buddy
No PIcs No Vegas Trip
No Boxing Event
ALL LIES!
You want me to send $1000 to a known Boxing troll & then he disappears
My $1000 is worth something
Your pictures are nothing
Zero
Make it make sense
Pictures...
$1000..Last edited by greeneye99; 08-09-2023, 03:30 PM.Comment
Comment