De La Hoya was gonna get Knocked out by Manny if the fight wasnt stopped! 100%

[Mr. Philadel]

Roach put money on a round 9 KO. Manny tried to give him a gift but Oscar quit before it could happen.

Oscar would have been knocked the **** out had he stayed in there for another round or two.
Does anyone really think he would have made it to the last bell? Come on now.

Don't be fooled by Oscar saying Pacquiao's shots don't hurt either. He's saying that to avoid further embarrassment of being punished by a smaller man who he should have blown out in a few rounds.

Exactly!!!!

[Swag Hustla]

manny hit DLH with everything he had over all the rounds and couldnt drop him. Floyd buckled DLh with two rights against a much stronger and healthier opponent.

so much for Pacs "POWER" dude is overated

Yeah Floyd buckled Oscar, but he seemed more surprised than hurt, otherwise Oscar wouldn't have continued to move forward. I think De la Hoya had the right game plan and probably would have beat Floyd in his prime. He made the first 5 rounds look easy with his jab.
Pacquiao had Oscar backing up, hiding, and laying on the ropes, which is something Floyd never did. Look at Oscar's face after both fights and tell me who landed the better/harder punches. Manny only 8 rounds while Floyd had the full 12 to do damage. Floyd did fight the bigger, better version of Oscar, but everyone seems to forget that the Mayweather- De la Hoya rematch was scheduled to take place at 147-150, which is why Oscar fought Forbes at 150. But Floyd retired, canceling the rematch, so he challenged Pac instead.
Floyd fought a much smaller Marquez who was worn from coming off 3 wars against bigger guys. Floyd didn't even try to make weight and had at least a 10-15 lb advantage, landed a lot of flush shots and still couldn't finish him. Pac is no god and has flaws, but he isn't overrated like Floyd.

[Hopkiller]

Yeah Floyd buckled Oscar, but he seemed more surprised than hurt, otherwise Oscar wouldn't have continued to move forward. I think De la Hoya had the right game plan and probably would have beat Floyd in his prime. He made the first 5 rounds look easy with his jab.
Pacquiao had Oscar backing up, hiding, and laying on the ropes, which is something Floyd never did. Look at Oscar's face after both fights and tell me who landed the better/harder punches. Manny only 8 rounds while Floyd had the full 12 to do damage. Floyd did fight the bigger, better version of Oscar, but everyone seems to forget that the Mayweather- De la Hoya rematch was scheduled to take place at 147-150, which is why Oscar fought Forbes at 150. But Floyd retired, canceling the rematch, so he challenged Pac instead.
Floyd fought a much smaller Marquez who was worn from coming off 3 wars against bigger guys. Floyd didn't even try to make weight and had at least a 10-15 lb advantage, landed a lot of flush shots and still couldn't finish him. Pac is no god and has flaws, but he isn't overrated like Floyd.

Although when Manny fought Oscar he wan't the same fighter that when against Mayweather. But I still believed Manny would be too fast for him and that's what gave him trouble, but de La Hoya needed the extra strength to hurt Pacquiao and slow him down. But I do believe a younger Oscar De La Hoya would've had a much easier time with Mayweather Jr. and would've beaten him.

[master_bates]

No i don't think so. Pacquiao's power is still there and actually it improved more than anything else. Pacquiao, just because of his destruction of 140 pounds champ Hatton, is a real challenge for Cotto to prove he's the best at 147.
Cotto 58% Pacquiao 42%, it's a hard fight for both but as i explained too many times Pacquiao should have stayed at 140 and Cotto has exactly the tools to annihilate Pacquiao's assets.

why do you want pacquiao to stay at 140? where the guy (pac) is doing exellent and confident fighting those "natural welts"(whose picking a lightweight oponents)?
its not like he's fighting there just to get KO.. he's got the ability, talent..
speed.. and most of all.. POWER!!

[/QUOTE]Cotto has exactly the tools to annihilate Pacquiao's assets.[/QUOTE]

well i must say pacquiao has its own tools to put cotto on canvas!!

[sycomantz]

Although when Manny fought Oscar he wan't the same fighter that when against Mayweather. But I still believed Manny would be too fast for him and that's what gave him trouble, but de La Hoya needed the extra strength to hurt Pacquiao and slow him down. But I do believe a younger Oscar De La Hoya would've had a much easier time with Mayweather Jr. and would've beaten him.

shows you dont know your history. DLH could never beat the opponents in his biggest fights.

DLH is a B class fighter just ilke Pac

[baracuda]

shows you dont know your history. DLH could never beat the opponents in his biggest fights.

DLH is a B class fighter just ilke Pac

b class fighter who lost to floyd by sd but lost to pac by tko....lol

floyd is c class in offense....

[S A M U R A I]

shows you dont know your history. DLH could never beat the opponents in his biggest fights.

DLH is a B class fighter just ilke Pac

Wow. It's really hard to believe how much of a clown you are.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Swag Hustla]

shows you dont know your history. DLH could never beat the opponents in his biggest fights.

DLH is a B class fighter just ilke Pac

Pac and Oscar B class? What the hell are you thinking? YOU don't know boxing history. First of all, learn to proof read. Second of all, yeah Oscar came up short in some of his big fights, but he beat Quartey, Vargas, Whitaker, and Chavez (the latter two were passed their prime, but they were still the top two guys at 140 and 147). Oscar was screwed against Trinidad and Mosley the second time. He was never outclassed in his losses except against Pacquiao and never knocked out except for the Hopkins match (which he was very competitive in against the much bigger guy). You are entitled to your own opinion, but my opinion is that De la Hoya has one of the best resumes in boxing history.

[sycomantz]

b class fighter who lost to floyd by sd but lost to pac by tko....lol

floyd is c class in offense....

if you know boxing. you would have seen that fight wants close. that was an easy UD.

but it shows you get lost in the ineffective BS flurries and punches that clearly missed thrown by DLH

i can careless how the fight was scored.

DLH got schooled

[sycomantz]

Pac and Oscar B class? What the hell are you thinking? YOU don't know boxing history. First of all, learn to proof read. Second of all, yeah Oscar came up short in some of his big fights, but he beat Quartey, Vargas, Whitaker, and Chavez (the latter two were passed their prime, but they were still the top two guys at 140 and 147). Oscar was screwed against Trinidad and Mosley the second time. He was never outclassed in his losses except against Pacquiao and never knocked out except for the Hopkins match (which he was very competitive in against the much bigger guy). You are entitled to your own opinion, but my opinion is that De la Hoya has one of the best resumes in boxing history.

yes B class fighters. just like cotto.

either you are an elite fighter or you arent. there are no levels of elite.

who gives a **** about DLH's resume when he lost all of his big fights...period.

thats like saying. i have a great resume b/ci fought the best fighters of my time and LOST, haha, shut the **** up

Pac fought people out of their prime and lost to JMM.

Cotto will get his ass beat by floyd