List of 3 division lineal champions, boxing history
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Again, I don’t care.
How can someone coming off a loss, fight a guy who’s 2-1-1 in his last 4 for the vacant lineage?
On top of the fact there are other current champions in the division at the time.
How can that possibly make any logical sense?Comment
-
Comment
-
Title belts have nothing to do with lineage, first off. There have been several world titlists that weren't even ranked in the top 10 by Ring or TBRB. Crawford vs Beltran was a lineal title fight even though Crawford only had the WBO belt, Beltran had no belts, and other guys had belts at the time.
When Pacquiao lost to Floyd he didn't fall in the TBRB rankings. He was just behind Floyd before the fight and nobody jumped him after Floyd beat him. Floyd retired leaving Pacquiao as the #1 fighter. Bradley beat Vargas (who was 26-0 at the time) and stopped Rios (who was coming off a win over 33-0 Mike Alvarado), which elevated him to #2. #1 fought #2 with the title vacant, thus a new lineage.Last edited by famicommander; 08-02-2023, 02:30 PM.Comment
-
How does Hopkins become lineal at MW? Beating a blown up WW who got his title from Joppy? Who did Floyd win his from? Baldomir with 9 losses? From a gift decision against Castillo? LOL We can pick apart a lot of lineal title holders and how they got there. Whether you like it or not, Pac is recognized as a lineal champ in 5 weight classes.Comment
-
I agree with Dan.
Historians, journalists, etc. are contradictory sources, good for information but their opinions contradict their facts as much as any fans. That is something that does not go away with knowledge.Comment
-
That’s because the Lineage wasn’t vacant then like it was at 147 in 2016 when Floyd retired.
Title belts have nothing to do with lineage, first off. There have been several world titlists that weren't even ranked in the top 10 by Ring or TBRB. Crawford vs Beltran was a lineal title fight even though Crawford only had the WBO belt, Beltran had no belts, and other guys had belts at the time.
When Pacquiao lost to Floyd he didn't fall in the TBRB rankings. He was just behind Floyd before the fight and nobody jumped him after Floyd beat him. Floyd retired leaving Pacquiao as the #1 fighter. Bradley beat Vargas (who was 26-0 at the time) and stopped Rios (who was coming off a win over 33-0 Mike Alvarado), which elevated him to #2. #1 fought #2 with the title vacant, thus a new lineage.
No the rule is they have to be “universally #1 and #2” which they weren’t. Hence why it can’t be for a new Lineage.Comment
-
Not really. Those Lineages were won and not vacant.
How does Hopkins become lineal at MW? Beating a blown up WW who got his title from Joppy? Who did Floyd win his from? Baldomir with 9 losses? From a gift decision against Castillo? LOL We can pick apart a lot of lineal title holders and how they got there. Whether you like it or not, Pac is recognized as a lineal champ in 5 weight classes.
Baldomir was the lineal champion because he beat Judah who beat Spinks and so on and so forth. You can’t “pick that apart” that is objective.
Pacquaio-Bradley was supposedly for a new lineage, which is can’t be from any logical standpoint.Comment
-
Crawford v Beltran was for the vacant Ring and lineal titles, plus Crawford's WBO strap. The other belts were occupied.
And you can pick apart several "universal" lineal titles. Fury is still claimed to be lineal at heavyweight by many even though he retired and TBRB and Ring Magazine now recognize Usyk as their champion.Last edited by famicommander; 08-02-2023, 04:06 PM.Comment
Comment