Comments Thread For: Crawford On Immediate Rematch With Spence: It Definitely Don't Have To Be At 147 Pounds

[LAchargers373]

Spence can’t get his reflexes back that’s the problem lol

[Smash]

yup a rematch at 147 & the guarantee goes from 10 mil to 1 mil

[NC Uppercut]

It’ll be the same outcome at 54 as it was at 47. Bud has his number! Also I believe that Bud should go out on a high note, he said he wouldn’t be fighting at 37-38 years old. I hope he stays true to his word.

Props to Bud!

[TheWinners]

I'm all for the rematch. Spence has to change his tune. He needs to focus on 1 punch power. Something to keep Crawford honest. He can't out box him. Gotta over power him.

The problem with this generation and boxing is a bunch of people on social media saying you're done after a loss. All the greats lost at some point. Comebacks are possible. But the opinions of many is why these fighters don't take the risks anymore. Because after 1 loss your careers over.

Spence go work on your defense and 1 punch power. Try again. And if not that's OK. Forrest had Mosley number. Still a hofer.

[baroidi]

It was a one sided beat down, no rematch.

[satiev1]

I fear for spence's life. He may end up in a coma in the rematch.

[Pac=Duran]

Rematch for what? Huge waste of time.

nobody will buy that **** after this ass whipping

[Smash]

He needs to focus on 1 punch power. Something to keep Crawford honest. He can't out box him. Gotta over power him..

he probably needs some serious peds if thats the case possibly

[STREET CLEANER]

Too bad Charlo is fighting Canelo. It would had been a real possibility that if Charlo face and beaten Tzsyu that he could had face Crawford. Imagine that going for undisputed in a third weight class.

[Tag, You're Hit]

It was completely one-sided other than 2 rounds...

Just because there wasn't a case for Spence winning any rounds besides the 1st and the 3rd, doesn't mean he didn't do some good work in some other rounds. Bud obviously won all of those other rounds, but Spence had some success. Maybe my definition of "completely one-sided" is different than yours. Certainly, the scoring was and should have been completely one-sided, but to me completely one-sided means an opponent didn't offer any resistance. As a recent example, while the beating wasn't nearly as bad, Inoue over Fulton was completely one-sided, in my opinion. I think Fulton landed 3 or 4 punches of significance the whole fight. Spence was more competitive.