Bud got this easy
35 year old Crawford vs 35 year old Mayweather.
Collapse
-
Yeah because we all know Floyd had slow reaction time like Spence, slow feet, couldn’t make adjustments after his opponent take away his best weapon, etc. Recency bias is a disease.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
50/50 fight.
Would be better as a 15 rounder.
Crawford def the better puncher, very importantly he matches Mayweather for reach.
Floyd is quicker
Both guys have unbelievable timing, I'm thinking maybe the speed is the difference, could look a little like Roy Jones vs Hopkins 1, where you have two guys with great IQ, timing, skill, but the faster guy edge's a few more rounds, being Mayweather.
But i wouldnt be confident as Crawford punches so well and has such timing that he could turn the fight on its head at any point.
There is a reason why Freddie Roach didn't want Manny in with Crawford for quite a few years when it was a viable fight.
Side note, Crawford has an unbelievable corner which adds to him as an overall package. His coaches really understand the game. I think the two fights Crawford really felt threatened was Postol and Spence, and he was impeccable in each fight, and fought completely different styles. I find myself more and more in awe of his ability as I write this
Comment
-
Crawford beats him at any age. Floyd would never get in the ring with a Crawford age 35 or lower.Comment
-
but I think this is about Crawford vs Floyd on a level field.
Comment
-
Definitely Crawford, man has no fear in him, goes for champs at his best and shows he’s the man
crawford is just the more complete fighterComment
Comment