Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford On Spence's Wins: All Those Fighters Had A Loss, Had Something Took [From] 'Em

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
    I think it's WAY better! Note, I said Crawford's resume.. AT 147!!!
    I understand what you're saying, I just disagree.

    Comment


    • #12
      Should be really good since each fighter wants to be seen as superior. Spence is a slight underdog so he will be trying harder than in any previous fight. War coming.

      Comment


      • #13
        Or will Crawford make it look easy?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post

          Mikey was undefeated.
          Ocampo was undefeated.
          Brook was undefeated at 147 and Spence took his belt.

          So
          Lol.

          That’s Crawford mental…he is delusional about his resume AND he doesn’t know what he’s talking about on top of it.
          Leicesterage Combat Talk Radio likes this.

          Comment


          • #15
            Crawford is about to get something took from him tonight too.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View Post

              If he makes Spence looks ordinary tonight then it won't be so delusional then now would it. I remember people thought Postol was a monster before Bud made him look ordinary.
              Postol was built up by TR to look that way, but when you examine his resume, it was very suspect. Most importantly what did Postol ever do in his career, that makes him a quality win? Postol's only decent win is against 3 loss Matthysse which isn't saying much. Buds resume is smoke and mirrors. ​
              vital1983 vital1983 likes this.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Fist_ti_cuffs View Post

                Postol was built up by TR to look that way, but when you examine his resume, it was very suspect. Most importantly what did Postol ever do in his career, that makes him a quality win? Postol's only decent win is against 3 loss Matthysse which isn't saying much. Buds resume is smoke and mirrors. ​
                He’s a bit of negative nancy, one of those c*nts that don’t put a stamp on rounds, but he’s tough to separate from. I’m not sure Taylor even beat him, same with Ramirez. And he was an old man then.

                Similar to Porter, who is the opposite, he makes fight’s close by being erratic. Similar caliber fighter’s. Guy’s no one cleans, but Crawford did. To both.

                Comment


                • #18
                  He's right. Spence never beat an undefeated champ unlike bud.
                  mathed mathed likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Spence did a lot of talking, time for all that is over now. He is gonna come at Bud aggressive early......got a feeling he will get caught with a sharp punch he doesn't see and that eye is going to become an issue sooner than later. No excuses, no talk about car wrecks

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post

                      Mikey was undefeated.
                      Ocampo was undefeated.
                      Brook was undefeated at 147 and Spence took his belt.

                      So
                      So you got Ocampo....you should have stopped there

                      Brook was a few months removed from a devastating loss and reconstructive surgery. Not only didn't he have the air of an undefeated fighter (because he wasn't), he had no business fighting til he'd had time to recover.

                      Mikey, really?? Not even a welterweight, just a pudgy lightweight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP