What Is Inoue's Flaw?

[The Big Dunn]

when did i brought up race??????? why do you always have to resort to this?

i called you out on your post which is typical of you. instead of giving the fighter props you will say he has a flaw that will give him problem if he goes to 135-140, knowing it's a very slim chance of that happening.

so now you painted this shadow over him that he has this flaw that will be his downfall at 135-140, but since he will never make it to that weight, the shadow will linger over him. why cant you juse show the same respect you do to the fighters you root for?

i mean, we aint gonna hear this from you on a fighter that you root for after him just beating the best guy in the division in a weight class that he moved up too...

You didnt call me out in anything.

The thread topic is what is Inoue’s flaw. I answered what is was imo. As did you.

Why would the answer to the thread question require giving him props? I guess saying he will not lose below 130 isn’t enough for your gay ass agenda.

Again idiot they talked about his moving up this morning post fight. Did you even watch the fight?

Shadow? Wtf. That is dumb as f-ck.

Of course you will. I said length is why GRJ had no chance against Loma. I have consistently talked about that.

Youre truly pathetic.

[DeeMoney]

I don't think he has any "flaws", in the sense of being less than average. He has relative flaws, in that he is not the best ever in some aspects; there have been great fighters in his weight classes who have been faster, rangier, had better defense.

But I don't think he has a flaw in the sense of writing he does something below average.

[IceTrayDaGang]

The thread topic is

yes, but you could have said he doesnt have flaws or that you dont see any, etc.... remember he just beat the best guy in his division and in your other post, you mention let's enjoy his victory right??? but here you are, entertaining this thread... you went on to say his flaw will give him problems if he goes up to 135-140, knowing that will probably not happen but since you paint this shadow over him, and if he stays in the lower weight racking up wins you will always bring this up saying his flaw will be his downfall if he goes up to 135-140 but since that wont happen, he will not get a chance to prove you wrong.... like i said, if crawford beat spence and a similar thread comes up, will you have the same energy? you wouldnt say crawford's flaw will be an issue for him if he goes up to 154-160....

[The Big Dunn]

i meant to say reach not stance on my previous post.... you are saying his flaws will be a problem when he moves up in weight to 135-140 with guys that had longer reach 72-73... as if he just didnt beat a guy with a reach of 70 1/2... but you painted this shadow over him knowing he will most likely not make it to 135-140.

No im not. Youre making that up to try and justify your utterly ridiculous posts and agenda in this thread.

You dont get the difference between 70 1/2 in reach and 72-74?

You’re desperate to make up anything to try and hide what is obvious- youre race agenda and race happiness as I stated earlier.

[IceTrayDaGang]

No im not. Youre making that up to try and justify your utterly ridiculous posts and agenda in this thread.

You dont get the difference between 70 1/2 in reach and 72-74?

You’re desperate to make up anything to try and hide what is obvious- youre race agenda and race happiness as I stated earlier.

you are bringing up the reach knowing he will never make it to 135-140. before all this, it was "inoue never face a slick boxer"... now it's "when he goes up to 135-140 and face guys with a reach of 72-74"... it's like the goal post always move further. like you said in the other post, why dont we just enjoy his victory?

[The Big Dunn]

yes, but you could have said he doesnt have flaws or that you dont see any, etc.... remember he just beat the best guy in his division and in your other post, you mention let's enjoy his victory right??? but here you are, entertaining this thread... you went on to say his flaw will give him problems if he goes up to 135-140, knowing that will probably not happen but since you paint this shadow over him, and if he stays in the lower weight racking up wins you will always bring this up saying his flaw will be his downfall if he goes up to 135-140 but since that wont happen, he will not get a chance to prove you wrong.... like i said, if crawford beat spence and a similar thread comes up, will you have the same energy? you wouldnt say crawford's flaw will be an issue for him if he goes up to 154-160....

Did you say he didnt have any flaws? No you said head movement, despite his just beating the best guy in the new division.

Yo dude f-ck off. Youre lying and embarrassing yourself trying to hide your agenda.

He is at 122. I posted he wouldnt lose at or below 130. I assume once he cleans 130 out, he goes up for a couple fights like all the ATG’s do.

Youre insane. Now youre just making up lie after lie making yourself look worse and worse.

How the f-ck do you know what weight class he will stop at? You don’t. Youre making up more BS.

That is because that imo isnt Crawford’s flaw you idiot.

Go away.

[The Big Dunn]

you are bringing up the reach knowing he will never make it to 135-140. before all this, it was "inoue never face a slick boxer"... now it's "when he goes up to 135-140 and face guys with a reach of 72-74"... it's like the goal post always move further. like you said in the other post, why dont we just enjoy his victory?

Again youre lying to try and save face. Espn talked about it.

I notice you didn’t answer if you watched the fight. My guess is you didnt.

I never once said anything like that. Youre such a pathetic lying racist maggot that youre taking something someone else said and lying that I did just to save face.

No goalpost is being moved. The thread question was answered.

Good bye maggot. Next time watch the fight instead of just logging in to race hate.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Did you say he didnt have any flaws? No you said head movement, despite his just beating the best guy in the new division.

Yo dude f-ck off. Youre lying and embarrassing yourself trying to hide your agenda.

He is at 122. I posted he wouldnt lose at or below 130. I assume once he cleans 130 out, he goes up for a couple fights like all the ATG’s do.

Youre insane. Now youre just making up lie after lie making yourself look worse and worse.

How the f-ck do you know what weight class he will stop at? You don’t. Youre making up more BS.

That is because that imo isnt Crawford’s flaw you idiot.

Go away.

yes, i said head movements and left it at that... you went on to say he has a flaw and he will most likely not be able to prove you wrong since he will probably never make it up to 135-140!!! so you will always carry this with you.... my comment about head movements, can be proven wrong in his next fights, etc... you are the only one making up lies here. it;s like you get offended when other races perform just as good or even better than the "slick boxers"..

[IceTrayDaGang]

Again youre lying to try and save face. Espn talked about it.

I notice you didn’t answer if you watched the fight. My guess is you didnt.

I never once said anything like that. Youre such a pathetic lying racist maggot that youre taking something someone else said and lying that I did just to save face.

No goalpost is being moved. The thread question was answered.

Good bye maggot. Next time watch the fight instead of just logging in to race hate.

yes, i saw the highlights and fulton looked loss in there. i have a job so at 6am pst, i was already at work not like some posters on here....

[The Big Dunn]

yes, i said head movements and left it at that... you went on to say he has a flaw and he will most likely not be able to prove you wrong since he will probably never make it up to 135-140!!! so you will always carry this with you.... my comment about head movements, can be proven wrong in his next fights, etc... you are the only one making up lies here. it;s like you get offended when other races perform just as good or even better than the "slick boxers"..

Says who? You? Again you didnt watch the fight and will not admit it. Anyone reading this knows youre full of shit because they talked about him moving up that high.

My comment can be proven just like yours.

Youre too much of a cowardly f@ggot to just admit you didnt watch the fight because you were scared the Asian would lose to the black guy ( who you said would win because he was a slick boxer).

You found out from the news Inoue won in amazing fashion and now youre race hating.

Absolutely pathetic piece of trash you are.