Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Marvin Hagler vs GGG who wins both in their prime

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
    Nothing Hagler has shown me that he has a better beard than GGG. Canelo hit way harder than Hearns. Name a single LHW champ Hearns Koed. Hearns never even Koed any titlist at SMW.

    Canelo hit wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy harder than Hearns.


    GGG in his prime could very well walk down Hagler. he's so much more skilled, it isn't even funny.
    A GRADE trolling, good work

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by TheIronMike View Post

      A GRADE trolling, good work



      troll is saying an athlete from the 70's can compete with the athletes of today. Aside from physical improvements, GGG is night and day more skilled than Hagler.



      Today's talent pool is 10X bigger than the talent pool of the 70's. Soviet boxers weren't even allowed to turn pro. There was some Golovkin, Beterbiev type of eastern euro talent that would've knocked Hagler spark out.



      This is like bringing up Jim Jeffries when he didn't compete against the best at his time due to racism. Same as it was in the 70's. most the world didn't partake in pro boxing.
      Last edited by HeadShots; 07-22-2023, 02:12 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post

        That's a lie. Now that you know it's a lie you might be the one on suicide watch.


        Marvelous’ Marvin Hagler didn’t die after COVID-19 vaccine, wife says

        https://nypost.com/2021/03/16/marvel...-vaccine-wife/

        WOW his wife said he didn't?


        your IQ is in single digits.



        FACTS:

        1. Took Vax.

        2. Died shortly after.




        VAXCUCKS ON SUICIDE WATCH

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by HeadShots View Post



          Shot Kovalev would knock that nobody spark out. Whoever that dude is would be considered a stumble bum in 2023
          You don't know who he is because you're an ignorant casual fan. Only a moron like you would comment on a fighter you know nothing about.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by HeadShots View Post


            WOW his wife said he didn't?


            your IQ is in single digits.



            FACTS:

            1. Took Vax.

            2. Died shortly after.




            VAXCUCKS ON SUICIDE WATCH
            Yeah his wife. Someone who was actually close to him. I'll take her word over a lying, low IQ , MAGA di ck sucker like you.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post

              It would be a great fight. Hagler is bit gun shy and did not like it to the body. Mentally I give GGG the edge. And this is important. Hagler fought too conservative with a much smaller Duran, allowed Sugar Ray to outsmart him and failed to get busy early in the fight, and fought Vito Antuofermo to a draw. All of these matches happed in Hagler's prime at age 32 or under.

              Power wise I would also give GGG the edge. Speed and reach wise, I would give Hagler the sight edge. Height and weight wise, I'd give GGG the slight edge.

              How has the style advantage? GGG ate up former weight fighters in his prime. Hagler didn't always do this. I see a pattern of Hagler struggling with short, lower weight fighters. Check for yourself, it's there.

              So who wins? I would predict GGG via spilt decision. The above reasons illustrate why.

              It is a great fantasy fight.
              You just made that BS up. Hagler was never as gun shy as Golovkin was in the second Canelo fight. Hagler was never hurt like Golovkin was from a Derevyanchenko body shot.

              You can't compare Golovkin's opponents to Hagler's. Golovkin's biggest win is Danny Jacobs and he barely won that. That speaks for itself. Hagler destroyed fighters like Danny Jacobs.
              Last edited by joseph5620; 07-22-2023, 04:42 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by satiev1 View Post

                ggg was 35 then. That wasn't his prime. Prime ggg was the guy that fought macklin and stevens.
                Macklin and Stevens are not even worth mentioning. That shows you how weak Golovkin's resume is if that's the best you can come up with.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post

                  Yeah his wife. Someone who was actually close to him. I'll take her word over a lying, low IQ , MAGA di ck sucker like you.
                  To be honest, I don't believe her, the pharmaceutical companies could pay her to shut up real easy or the doctor saying oh he just had a heart attack we have no evidence as to why, I personally know of 4 people that were healthy and had heart attacks within 3 weeks of getting their shots, there is so much documented papers coming out that will end with these covid vaccines being the biggest fck up in human history, people are dying and having serious issues all over the world, its no wonder phizer tried to have all the testing results locked away for 75 years it took a court order to release the details and they are shocking, its real bad and more is surfacing everywhere everyday.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                    To be honest, I don't believe her, the pharmaceutical companies could pay her to shut up real easy or the doctor saying oh he just had a heart attack we have no evidence as to why, I personally know of 4 people that were healthy and had heart attacks within 3 weeks of getting their shots, there is so much documented papers coming out that will end with these covid vaccines being the biggest fck up in human history, people are dying and having serious issues all over the world, its no wonder phizer tried to have all the testing results locked away for 75 years it took a court order to release the details and they are shocking, its real bad and more is surfacing everywhere everyday.
                    You can speculate all you want. But there is absolutely no evidence that she's lying or anything else that relates to vaccines. Nothing.

                    I'll take her word over internet conspiracy theories.
                    Last edited by joseph5620; 07-22-2023, 04:51 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post

                      You can speculate all you want. But there is absolutely no evidence that she's lying or anything else that relates to vaccines. Nothing.

                      I'll take her word over internet conspiracy theories.
                      Off course there is no evidence because they cant prove the vaccines kill anybody unless you drop dead in minutes from receiving it, Im not talking about internet theories Im talking about cited documents from governments and health organisations and medical journals, its all there if you care to look its not theories its very damming evidence.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP