Comments Thread For: Anthony Joshua: We're Not Fighting Regularly Enough; Us Fighters Getting Treated Too Well

[Smash]

greedy belly v full belly

[Combat Talk Radio]

It's true. It's pretty cool that not one of thee best 3 hws h2h status are saying this, but a mediocre/ very good hw can admit that. Aj still has the heart beat of an assassin no matter if he wins or loses, he keeps fighting.

He's saying this AFTER 3 dominant losses. One of which he shouldn't have

[al-Xander]

Show me a solution to this massive inactivity plaguing this sport. There is none.

[LAchargers373]

Did Klitshko suddenly lose some power when he hit 40?

I laid out my case; I have nothing further to add.

Father Time is undefeated genius

[The D3vil]

The problem with boxing is that there's too much variation in the pay scale.

The NBA & MLB figured out how to solve this years ago with collective bargaining

Instead of LeBron James making $100 a year, he might make $40 million, while the guys sitting on the bench are making at least $4-5 million and they have pensions, healthcare, and better job security as they get veteran senority

Instead of Joshua making $25 million a fight, he should make about half that, while the revenue should be shared with the fighters at the lower end of the card, while at the same time investing in all of their healthcare, pensions, etc. . .

Boxing will be a mess until it becomes organized and the labor force shares the revenue and acquires some security.

Until then, it will always be a feast or famine sport where guys at the top are strictly mercenaries chasing the biggest paydays possible because "why not?" if there's no security in the sport.

[Monty Fisto]

Father Time is undefeated genius

Power is the first to go, like everyone says. Oh wait, no one says that.

[LAchargers373]

Power is the first to go, like everyone says. Oh wait, no one says that.

U right. AJ still knocking people out Fa sho good observation

[Monty Fisto]

U right. AJ still knocking people out Fa sho good observation

Difficult to work out what you are trying to argue now. I'll assume you've given up on the original point of discussion, since you've adopted this scattershot approach.