Weights: David Tua 237.7, Shane Cameron 228.2

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BMWM3P
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 5402
    • 245
    • 345
    • 12,386

    #101
    Originally posted by Mr._Pink
    I bet you edited that yourself, you need to change that to take a seat.

    Comment

    • paul750
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2005
      • 7636
      • 334
      • 237
      • 16,264

      #102
      Originally posted by Mr. Green
      he got tagged OVER and OVER again by a 5'10 guy with a short reach.

      defense my ass.

      lennox lewis would mop his ass up.

      only thing he is better than tua at is having longer arms and being taller.



      ****** judges messed up that score so bad.
      He was still green at that stage, and Tua was in his prime. His win over Byrd showed that he had a lot of ability to go along with his physical tools. Tua just never had the fundamentals needed to be truly great. Ike appeared to be much more versatile. I'm a big fan of Tua and hope he does well before he ends his career, but Ike was the better all round boxer. We'll never know how well he would have done, but I'd certainly say that he'd have beaten the likes of Rahman, who Tua struggled with, and taken care of Ruiz and the others who were below Lewis.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP