Crawford has the same age than Golovkin when he fought with Canelo

[-DSG-]

Wouldn't you say Spence is also passed his prime?

Yes but he should be closer to his prime than Crawford is.

[SceneBoxer]

i posted in another thread that Crawford and Spence are a bit past their prime.... so it's still considered an even fight...

[IronDanHamza]

Yes but he should be closer to his prime than Crawford is.

I'd argue it's the other way around.

[SweetPbfAli]

There is prime and peak. Bud's peak ended around the Horn fight and he's at the end of his prime now.

[dibzvincent143]

And the same guys were crying about ggg being an old man and SHOT, are saying Crawford is in his prime against Spence.

Lol
Another prove that the hate for Canelo is real.

Those guys are not real.boxing fans.

GGG was in his prime? Yeah, a experienced fighter, without damage, SOFT fights except the fight with Jacobs (the only good fighter of his resume at that moment before canelo).


Morales was.shot when he was 32

Feroz Vargas was.shot when he was 27.

Márquez was in prime 35-40 years.

The hypocrisy

GGG was still very good at that age during his first fight against Canelo. That’s why he won, and should’ve gotten the decision he deserved.
He wasn’t at his best anymore, but definitely not old or shot. The second fight still could’ve gone either way with GGG at an even more advance age, so of course it makes fans think about the what ifs, if it happened during the time it supposed to happen. Which was 3 years earlier.

[TheIronMike]

And the same guys were crying about ggg being an old man and SHOT, are saying Crawford is in his prime against Spence.

Lol
Another prove that the hate for Canelo is real.

Those guys are not real.boxing fans.

GGG was in his prime? Yeah, a experienced fighter, without damage, SOFT fights except the fight with Jacobs (the only good fighter of his resume at that moment before canelo).


Morales was.shot when he was 32

Feroz Vargas was.shot when he was 27.

Márquez was in prime 35-40 years.

The hypocrisy

Show me a thread created in the last month with someone saying Crawford is in his prime.

What's Red Herring in Spanish?

[TheIronMike]

Has anyone actually been saying that Crawford is in his prime or ios the TS just making that bit up? I haven't seen anyone say that although honestly I also haven't been paying much attention.

Anyway, no at 35 Crawford is obviously past his very best and TBF Spence probably is too, even at a sprightly 33. This fight needed to happen 3 years ago.

The OP is making stuff up. He lives in a fantasy world. One of the many schizophrenics on this site.

[Regge]

I don't know but the fans are hypocrite guys
he is 35 and nobody is talking about his age

No channels, no boxing experts


Lol

But with Canelo the hate is real

I've noticed that no one is mentioning Crawford being almost 36 yet they say Kovalev was a dinosaur at the same age lol

[Mexican_Puppet]

I've noticed that no one is mentioning Crawford being almost 36 yet they say Kovalev was a dinosaur at the same age lol

Thats what i hate, look the millions of fans being haters,

They are not real boxing fans
They are not saying a single thing about Crawford being 36

Media? Nope
Fans? Nope
Boxing "experts"? No

[Mexican_Puppet]

The OP is making stuff up. He lives in a fantasy world. One of the many schizophrenics on this site.

All the media is saying Crawford is prime, and that the fight is the Best fight in boxing and the winner Will be the face of boxing

Stop.

You are a black guy, your opinión is biased.

I can't trae people saying "if Spence wins, he beat an old man, he can't be the #1".

The truth hurt, i know.