Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Haney-Lomachenko Was Very Close, There Was No Robbery

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    A notorious crook reminding people how boxing is an honorable sport while defending a blatant robbery.

    Pure perfection. Like Mona Lisa.

    Comment


    • #32
      Sulaiman is full of ****!! Sulaiman you have no credit ability, your just as bad as Bob Arum!! FULL OF ****!!!!
      Cypocryphy Cypocryphy likes this.

      Comment


      • #33
        Wow! A sanctioning body president is defending the corrupt business of boxing. Of course he's going to claim it wasn't a robbery. That's like a banker saying that his bank doesn't steal from its clients when allegations of fraud and theft are levied against it.

        GTFOH! You need an independent agency to oversee this business. The promoters, WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF and NSAC are corrupt to the core. Too much money moving in and out, going into accounts for services rendered.
        Last edited by Cypocryphy; 05-24-2023, 01:06 AM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Sulaiman is a big part of the problem

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by boxingitis View Post

            Everyone can Think what they want. Like Morreti thought the score was 116 to 112. Is that true?
            Yes. Then we as reasonable people can disagree with that, like I did with his scoring of the 10th for Haney.

            Look dude what you posted was very dangerous. Sadly, the site has seen a ton of that since Loma lost.

            If you scored the fight for Haney, it isnt for any reason other than how the fight played out.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Cypocryphy View Post
              Wow! A sanctioning body president is defending the corrupt business of boxing. Of course he's going to claim it wasn't a robbery. That's like a banker saying that his bank doesn't steal from its clients when allegations of fraud and theft are levied against it.

              GTFOH! You need an independent agency to oversee this business. The promoters, WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF and NSAC are corrupt to the core. Too much money moving in and out, going into accounts for services rendered.
              Wahhhh wahhh wahhhh wahhh.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                Yes. Then we as reasonable people can disagree with that, like I did with his scoring of the 10th for Haney.

                Look dude what you posted was very dangerous. Sadly, the site has seen a ton of that since Loma lost.

                If you scored the fight for Haney, it isnt for any reason other than how the fight played out.
                Dangerous. It's Ok for people THINK what they want. If the fans believe a fighter won, then that's their belief. Boxing if about opinion.

                So Shakur, De La Hoya, Keyshawn, Robert Garcia, Eddie Reynoso, and others beleive Loma won. Either they don't know **** about boxing or fans are blind.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by boxingitis View Post

                  Dangerous. It's Ok for people THINK what they want. If the fans believe a fighter won, then that's their belief. Boxing if about opinion.

                  So Shakur, De La Hoya, Keyshawn, Robert Garcia, Eddie Reynoso, and others beleive Loma won. Either they don't know **** about boxing or fans are blind.
                  I have no problem with anyone thinking Loma won. Those pros didnt make any comments about Rolly like you did. That is the part I feel was dangerous because it is close to the race garbage the very worst loma fans have been spewing.

                  To suggest people that scored the fight for Haney felt Rolly stoppage was good implies something that there is no proof or evidence exists.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    For once, I can truly say that I agree with WBC President Mauricio Sulaiman. He got it right this time. There was no robbery. Just a close fight that could have gone either way or a draw.

                    Some saw Haney winning it while others had Loma edging it. Now if anyone could demand a rematch; Then it's Sulaiman but he sees no reason to because the right man won and the judges got it right.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Gary Coleman View Post
                      My sentiments exactly. Didn't realize so many people disliked Devin Haney.
                      You are absolutely correct and we all know the reason why to.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP