Shane Mosley must of been on the **** here..............
Collapse
-
It's people who don't have the genetics and don't workout that tend to complain.
It's just that in today's society there are more of these guys that you scratch your head and start to question more after hearing about the use of PED from athletes. It makes everybody suspect in your mind.
Back then, it was just the Alpha-Males, the rare 1 out 1000 type that had the ability to have such a physique.Comment
-
Exactly.
Isn't it odd how every time somebody gets busted for steroids, they magically ONLY did it for the period they got busted.
How many criminals get busted ONLY the first time they did it?
Or does it seem more likely that Shane had been juicing for awhile, and then went to BALCO to amp up even more.?Comment
-
Comment
-
Look at Bradley in my sig, that guy has a less than 5/8% body fat or something like that and look at the difference between him and Mosley, Mosley's muscle is not lean and natural looking like Bradley's.Comment
-
If you have the right genes for muscle growth, with your hormone total levels around say, 900+ng/DL, with a high percentage of Free Testosterone, you shouldn't have a problem getting quality muscles like that. There are even people that have been recorded to have total T-levels of 1500+ng/DL. It's just that they are in the lower percentile when it is that high.

Bobby Pandour
1876 - 1920
[IMG]http://daved****r.com/fusionbb/fbbuploads/med_1200706836-Bobby_Pandour__002__.jpg[/IMG]

Comment
-
John Grimek.
Look at the date. This was before the 50's introduction of anabolic steroids in America by Dr. Zieglar.

George Hackenschmidt



Comment
-
Comment
-
My point was geared more towards people thinking you can't have muscles naturally. That anybody with muscles is basically a steroid user. That's the way it seems many today view it because of all the doubt with today's athletes being caught with PED.
For Shane: What are you looking at exactly?Comment
Comment