Tweet
Nothing that you said has shed any light on anything. You’ve just repeated the same cliché excuses that all the anti-Crawford YouTube channels and detractors in the comment section say. And they don’t even believe the s h i t that they say. I doubt that you’ve thought of any of this on your own. You have come up with an elaborate way to put the blame on the fighter and completely remove blame from the promoter. So now its Crawford’s fault that Bob Arum couldn’t get the fight made. Oddly enough Spence seemed very eager to fight Jeff Horn when he was the WBO champion and also promoted by Top Rank. His tune completely changed after Crawford got the belt.
Coming up with fantasies about constant hold ups that don’t exist just comes off as desperate. They have only been in negotiations once. What are all of these hold ups that you have cooked up in your imagination. If Al Haymon is openly saying that he is not going to let anybody else touch the fight what else is there for him to talk to the “lead promoter” about? If Errol Spence is rejecting the proposal of having outside investors come in flatly on its face why does he need to know who they are? It was flatly rejected. There’s nothing else to talk about. So just because he didn’t tell the world the names of the investors its not shady bad business. It sounds like you’re really looking to have a problem with Crawford. The fact that you are emotionally invested in being against the guy just might cloud your perception of reality when it comes to this subject. And to correct one of your more stark misconceptions; most of Crawford’s fights have not been on Pay Per View. There is no way that he could have taken “more money on the backend”’ when he’s fighting on television. This whole irrelevant argument about him not being able sell is based on ignorance of the sport. If he’s not even fighting on Pay Per View for most of his fights what sells are you counting other than the gate and what backend is there to take more of? Don’t let anger and bias blind you. We all have fighters that we favor more than others. But its better for the sport if we all as fans stay grounded in reality. And trying to defend promoters and blame fighters is just a backward position for a boxing fan to take.
And there is no way in the world for you to know whether any fighter in the history of the sport has been granted the right to approve or disapprove expenses for a fight promotion. Stop it. You definitely just made that up. But it just so happens that Stephen Espinoza is on video complaining about the hold up it caused when Floyd Mayweather wouldn’t approve certain expenses before the Pacquiao fight. So you’re clearly wrong about that one even though you just made that s h i t up in the first place.
And talking about his social media posts to make an appraisal of his intelligence just shows that you have a personal dislike towards the guy that makes it impossible for you to talk about him with any appreciable degree of honesty. There are so many black kids from the hood that are deprived access to quality educational experiences and therefore struggle with literacy but are also highly intelligent and naturally gifted that you wouldn’t make comments like that if you realized how ignorant and insensitive it makes you sound.
Coming up with fantasies about constant hold ups that don’t exist just comes off as desperate. They have only been in negotiations once. What are all of these hold ups that you have cooked up in your imagination. If Al Haymon is openly saying that he is not going to let anybody else touch the fight what else is there for him to talk to the “lead promoter” about? If Errol Spence is rejecting the proposal of having outside investors come in flatly on its face why does he need to know who they are? It was flatly rejected. There’s nothing else to talk about. So just because he didn’t tell the world the names of the investors its not shady bad business. It sounds like you’re really looking to have a problem with Crawford. The fact that you are emotionally invested in being against the guy just might cloud your perception of reality when it comes to this subject. And to correct one of your more stark misconceptions; most of Crawford’s fights have not been on Pay Per View. There is no way that he could have taken “more money on the backend”’ when he’s fighting on television. This whole irrelevant argument about him not being able sell is based on ignorance of the sport. If he’s not even fighting on Pay Per View for most of his fights what sells are you counting other than the gate and what backend is there to take more of? Don’t let anger and bias blind you. We all have fighters that we favor more than others. But its better for the sport if we all as fans stay grounded in reality. And trying to defend promoters and blame fighters is just a backward position for a boxing fan to take.
And there is no way in the world for you to know whether any fighter in the history of the sport has been granted the right to approve or disapprove expenses for a fight promotion. Stop it. You definitely just made that up. But it just so happens that Stephen Espinoza is on video complaining about the hold up it caused when Floyd Mayweather wouldn’t approve certain expenses before the Pacquiao fight. So you’re clearly wrong about that one even though you just made that s h i t up in the first place.
And talking about his social media posts to make an appraisal of his intelligence just shows that you have a personal dislike towards the guy that makes it impossible for you to talk about him with any appreciable degree of honesty. There are so many black kids from the hood that are deprived access to quality educational experiences and therefore struggle with literacy but are also highly intelligent and naturally gifted that you wouldn’t make comments like that if you realized how ignorant and insensitive it makes you sound.
Comment