I think I will use Boxrec's p4p rankings over Ring's

**jmmfan** · 09-27-2009, 06:36 AM

That's a pretty terrible list.

**araindon** · 09-27-2009, 06:37 AM

I don't know dude, it's okay in some parts...but Miguel Cotto is like 35th!!

**Spray_resistant** · 09-27-2009, 06:40 AM

Ring's is just too awful....I mean Izzy and Rafa? They have been way too inactive and why should Caballero be on there at all?

**araindon** · 09-27-2009, 06:45 AM

Originally posted by Spray_resistant

Ring's is just too awful....I mean Izzy and Rafa? They have been way too inactive and why should Caballero be on there at all?

This is true. Izzy, Rafa and Cabellero have no right to be on there since the first two been inactive and Cabellero hasn't done anything special. But JMM at 10? PWilliams 15? Donaire at 19? Cotto and Calderon at 35 and 34. I don't know how they work it out, but I think that's even worse. I reckon 90% of the users on here probably have a better P4P list than Ring and Boxrec though

whats yours?

**cyutetrick** · 09-27-2009, 06:47 AM

Originally posted by Spray_resistant

Ring's is just too awful....I mean Izzy and Rafa? They have been way too inactive and why should Caballero be on there at all?

your right about those three guys but marquez is below that dude from japan and thailand and chad dawson people forget that marquez is the best at junior lightweight and lightweight and hopkins is still considered by many the best lheavy

**MayweatherJones** · 09-27-2009, 06:48 AM

I agree with BoxRecs top 4 to an extent.

**Mersey** · 09-27-2009, 06:49 AM

The Ring has some questionable names on their list, but boxrec? You can't take there list seriously.

Mosley above Pac?
Froch number 11?
Cotto 35th?

lol

**cyutetrick** · 09-27-2009, 06:52 AM

yea i have a feeling someone from ESPN made those ratings....

**Mersey** · 09-27-2009, 06:53 AM

They use some weird points system. It doesn't work very well.

I think I will use Boxrec's p4p rankings over Ring's