Fury & Warren are LIVID at Usyk

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • War Room
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 9296
    • 2,806
    • 662
    • 19,006

    #51
    Originally posted by Smash

    aj has nothing to do with the fury usky talks, hes just a very jealous onlooker from afar
    Let me answer it for you and you're being pathetic by not answering =--->

    NO.
    Usyk didn't get the lionshare in the rematch.

    WHY?
    Because he's B-Side.

    NO.
    Usyk didn't get a rematch clause in the rematch.

    WHY?
    Because he's the B-Side.

    Usyk wanting these outlandish demands from Fury is 100% pricing himself out.

    Bend the knee, you've been bested.

    Comment

    • Smash
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 14492
      • 6,044
      • 7,495
      • 21,172

      #52
      Originally posted by War Room

      Let me answer it for you and you're being pathetic by not answering =--->

      NO.
      Usyk didn't get the lionshare in the rematch.

      WHY?
      Because he's B-Side.

      NO.
      Usyk didn't get a rematch clause in the rematch.

      WHY?
      Because he's the B-Side.

      Usyk wanting these outlandish demands from Fury is 100% pricing himself out.

      Bend the knee, you've been bested.
      a rematch clause in a rematch lol

      there was no outlandish demands, only a reaction to furys outlandish demands and only if usky won, fury would win tho, easy money he said, he was exposed, he bent the knee and was bested

      Comment

      • War Room
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2014
        • 9296
        • 2,806
        • 662
        • 19,006

        #53
        Originally posted by Smash

        a rematch clause in a rematch lol

        there was no outlandish demands, only a reaction to furys outlandish demands and only if usky won, fury would win tho, easy money he said, he was exposed, he bent the knee and was bested
        Usyk asking for a rematch if he loses is lol. You're B-Side, you lose...you're out...A-Side onto the next. Welcome to boxing 101 on planet Earth.

        B-Side wanting a rematch clause is an outlandish demand.

        B-Side demanding 50/50 is an outlandish demand.

        B-Side asking for 60/40 to the winner is an outlandish demand.

        B-Side asking for lions share in a rematch in an outlandish demand.

        AJ gave none of that, why would Fury then?

        Exactly.

        Comment

        • Smash
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 14492
          • 6,044
          • 7,495
          • 21,172

          #54
          Originally posted by War Room

          Usyk asking for a rematch if he loses is lol. You're B-Side, you lose...you're out...
          thats just pure dumb, nothing else to say really

          Comment

          • Smash
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 14492
            • 6,044
            • 7,495
            • 21,172

            #55
            Originally posted by War Room



            B-Side asking for lions share in a rematch in an outlandish demand.


            Exactly.
            for the winner of the fight, u missing that part?

            Comment

            • War Room
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 9296
              • 2,806
              • 662
              • 19,006

              #56
              Originally posted by Smash

              thats just pure dumb, nothing else to say really
              Since when does B-Side get a rematch clause if they lose? Show me the history.

              Originally posted by Smash

              for the winner of the fight, u missing that part?
              Did Usyk get the lions share in the AJ rematch? No he didn't. Are YOU missing that part?

              There is no precedent for winner to get lions share % in a rematch. Just like their roadblock proposal of winner of the first fight getting 60/40, it doesn't exisst and top billing at the box office doesn't do those deals. Who even has done that deal anyway?

              Do you just like hate gypsies or something?

              Comment

              • Smash
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 14492
                • 6,044
                • 7,495
                • 21,172

                #57
                Originally posted by War Room

                Since when does B-Side get a rematch clause if they lose? Show me the history.



                Did Usyk get the lions share in the AJ rematch? No he didn't. Are YOU missing that part?

                There is no precedent for winner to get lions share % in a rematch. Just like their roadblock proposal of winner of the first fight getting 60/40, it doesn't exisst and top billing at the box office doesn't do those deals. Who even has done that deal anyway?

                Do you just like hate gypsies or something?
                it cant be explained to u anymore, i think u have a mental block or something, time for a nap maybe?

                Comment

                • War Room
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 9296
                  • 2,806
                  • 662
                  • 19,006

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Smash

                  it cant be explained to u anymore, i think u have a mental block or something, time for a nap maybe?
                  Because you CAN'T explain it and not sound like a hater. There is no precedent for a B-Side to make outlandish requests from a superstar A-Side.

                  Usyk beat AJ, he didn't get lions share in a rematch...he didn't get some weird 60/40 to the winner in the rematch. It didn't happen and shouldn't happen for Fury.

                  Usyk never got anything in his favor against AJ. Usky didn't get a rematch clause favoring him at all.

                  Put down the haterade, you're 100% unreasonable.

                  Comment

                  • Smash
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 14492
                    • 6,044
                    • 7,495
                    • 21,172

                    #59
                    Originally posted by War Room

                    Because you CAN'T explain it and not sound like a hater. There is no precedent for a B-Side to make outlandish requests from a superstar A-Side.

                    Usyk beat AJ, he didn't get lions share in a rematch...he didn't get some weird 60/40 to the winner in the rematch. It didn't happen and shouldn't happen for Fury.

                    Usyk never got anything in his favor against AJ. Usky didn't get a rematch clause favoring him at all.

                    Put down the haterade, you're 100% unreasonable.
                    Listen, fury demands 70%,the greedybelly, ok says usyk, i will make it up on the rematch if i win, lets do 70% for the winner in the rematch, fury cry cry cry

                    now from furys perspective, i get 70% for the first fight, great, now usky is offering me another 70% for the rematch, this is a great offer for fury is it not???? fury then says, no hold on, i only want 50% if i win lol, usyk offered him 70% to win but fury says no if i win i only want 50% not 70%, so what does this mean? usky thinks he will win and fury is scurred of the MW, your welcome

                    Comment

                    • War Room
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2014
                      • 9296
                      • 2,806
                      • 662
                      • 19,006

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Smash

                      Listen, fury demands 70%,the greedybelly, ok says usyk, i will make it up on the rematch if i win, lets do 70% for the winner in the rematch, fury cry cry cry

                      now from furys perspective, i get 70% for the first fight, great, now usky is offering me another 70% for the rematch, this is a great offer for fury is it not???? fury then says, no hold on, i only want 50% if i win lol, usyk offered him 70% to win but fury says no if i win i only want 50% not 70%, so what does this mean? usky thinks he will win and fury is scurred of the MW, your welcome
                      Fury deserves 70%, he's the star, he's the A-Side.

                      There is no precedent for a winner to get 70% in a rematch. AJ didn't go for that in their rematch did they? AJ got the lions share in the rematch, win/lose/draw. That's how boxing works.

                      If you beat the man, you get a better % GUARANTEE in the rematch. Not some weird floating scale % based on who wins or loses in the rematch.

                      Are you OK dude??
                      Last edited by War Room; 03-27-2023, 12:01 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP