Tank's last 7 opponents are 138-2-2, including Ryan Garcia

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chollo Vista
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2012
    • 10801
    • 1,428
    • 1,024
    • 154,684

    #51
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza

    .

    Mayweather was ranked #1 at Jr Middleweight when he fought Canelo. Canelo I think was unranked at 175 when he fought Bivol. Do you have a point here, or?

    .
    post a link

    Mayweather was fought DLH in 2007. You're telling me he was Ring #1 6 years later in 2013 in that division based off that one victory over shot to schit DLH?

    If so, this whole conversation about Ring Rankings is bullschit to begin with

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48376
      • 4,778
      • 266
      • 104,043

      #52
      Originally posted by Chollo Vista

      That's not how you cite a source LMAO

      Where did you go to school?
      Are you retarded or what?

      Posting the literal link to the literal source for the Rankings per year for the entire decade where said fighter had all of his fights is NOT how you cite a source in your brain?

      You are a very strange character and I would strongly suggest revision.

      Comment

      • Chollo Vista
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 10801
        • 1,428
        • 1,024
        • 154,684

        #53
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza

        Well it is, because it covers the entirety of the decade at 130 lbs which is where Tank had all of his fights outside of Gamboa.

        And what different fighters by the way? We are talking about Tank's opponents and which were or weren't ranked in the Top which is entirely covered by the link provided in post #32.

        Answer being 0.
        LMAO this dummy don't even know how to properly cite sources

        you can't and don't want too because you know it will prove my point and embarrass you further

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48376
          • 4,778
          • 266
          • 104,043

          #54
          Originally posted by Chollo Vista

          LMAO this dummy don't even know how to properly cite sources

          you can't and don't want too because you know it will prove my point and embarrass you further
          I mean, what do you want me to do bud? The link I provided you is the annual Ring Ratings for the weight class Tank fought in for the entire decade.

          You can look at them and see who he did or didn't beat that was ranked in the Top 5 of said division at the time they fought.

          I genuinely don't know how I could possibly make this easier for you to understand.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 48376
            • 4,778
            • 266
            • 104,043

            #55
            Originally posted by Chollo Vista

            post a link

            Mayweather was fought DLH in 2007. You're telling me he was Ring #1 6 years later in 2013 in that division based off that one victory over shot to schit DLH?

            If so, this whole conversation about Ring Rankings is bullschit to begin with
            Erm, no he was ranked #1 at 154 when he beat Canelo because he beat Miguel Cotto in 2012 who was ranked #1 at 154, so he then took his #1 ranking, and then fought Canelo the following year in 2013 to which he was ranked #1 at 154.

            The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: Junior Middleweight--2010s - BoxRec

            You're struggling here mate I think you might want to take a time out

            Comment

            • Chollo Vista
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 10801
              • 1,428
              • 1,024
              • 154,684

              #56
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza

              I mean, what do you want me to do bud?
              Just leave it at that, brother.

              you don't know how to properly cite sources, yet you call yourself objective

              No worries

              Comment

              • Chollo Vista
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2012
                • 10801
                • 1,428
                • 1,024
                • 154,684

                #57
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                Erm, nohe was ranked #1 at 154 when he beat Canelo because he beat Miguel Cotto in 2012 who was ranked #1 at 154, so he then took his #1 ranking, and then fought Canelo the following year in 2013 to which he was ranked #1 at 154.

                The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: Junior Middleweight--2010s - BoxRec

                You're struggling here mate I think you might want to take a time out
                Another clear example of how these rankings are bullschit haha

                No context whatsoever, just rankings, right?

                ill say it again, post the Ring Rankings of LSC, Hector Garcia, Pedraza at the time Tank fought them

                Do you know how to do it properly?
                Last edited by Chollo Vista; 04-24-2023, 11:44 PM.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 48376
                  • 4,778
                  • 266
                  • 104,043

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Chollo Vista

                  Another clear example of how these rankings are bullschit haha

                  No context whatsoever, just rankings, right?
                  Well, that's another debate altogether. That can be argued.

                  What can't be argued though is Tank has currently beaten 0 fighters ranked in those Top 5 rankings at the time they fought at the division being fought in. That's a fact.

                  But again the legitimacy of those said rankings is a whole other debate.

                  Comment

                  • IronDanHamza
                    BoxingScene Icon
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 48376
                    • 4,778
                    • 266
                    • 104,043

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Chollo Vista

                    Just leave it at that, brother.

                    you don't know how to properly cite sources, yet you call yourself objective

                    No worries
                    What source do you want?

                    We are talking about The Ring Rankings, and which of whom Tank beat that were currently in the Top 5 of the division being fought in.

                    I have then literally given you a link to those literal rankings across the entire decade where you can see who he fought in those Top 10 rankings spanning from 2010-2019 at 130 lbs where he exclusively fought.

                    What more could I possibly provide you in a way your little brain will be able to understand?

                    Genuinely, that's an honest question.

                    Comment

                    • Chollo Vista
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 10801
                      • 1,428
                      • 1,024
                      • 154,684

                      #60
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                      Well, that's another debate altogether. That can be argued.

                      What can't be argued though is Tank has currently beaten 0 fighters ranked in those Top 5 rankings at the time they fought at the division being fought in. That's a fact.

                      But again the legitimacy of those said rankings is a whole other debate.
                      You have done nothing but found a talking point and clinged on to it for dear life like you're riding on the side of an airplane leaving the runway LMAO

                      Go to sleep Mr. Rankings

                      And when you wake up maybe you'll know how to properly quote a source while being "objective"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP