Comments Thread For: Fulton: I Feel Like I'm Gonna Out-Class Inoue; The Power's Not Gonna Matter To Me

[Sid-Knee]

So, I guess you feel like your opinion matters more than what actually happened and Figueroa's actual record. His record was undefeated before he lost to Fulton. Also, since when is a 2 division champion not considered world class? Keep trying, but make sure to use real facts. When Fulton wins, don't go silent.

Are you of the opinion that Lewis/Holyfield was a draw and not a robbery? Holyfield didn't lose? It's called knowing how to score a fight.

You could have 3 titles at 3 weights and still not be world class. Jorge Arce did that and never beat a single world class fighter. Broner is another one. Having a title isn't a symbol of being world class. It just means you had the fortune to fight a scrub for a world title or got a robbery. Knowing which is which is about standards and having the intellectual ability to understand the difference.

I don't have to try. When it's people like you i'm dealing with, i could be in a deep sleep and still have the rational upper hand. It's you who needs to try harder.

Fulton has to get into a ring with Inoue first. But if he does, don't worry. I'll be here when reality has taken place to see what you have to say.

[Sid-Knee]

Boxingscene has been saying that Andrade isn't world class for years and hes a 2 division champ.

Don't you come in here with your rational comments. What do you think you're on? Holiday?

[Sid-Knee]

That's because he didn't beat a champion for his belts, but Andrade is a skilled boxer, no one knows quite what level until he fights a champion.

What champion did Figueroa beat?

Not only that, but Figueroa isn't a two division champion either.

[Rebelrbg]

Bruh, Inoue's not a one dimensional plodder. He's an elite technical boxer with a high ring IQ and exceptional footwork.

Never said he was, I'm just stating a fact, Inoue has never fought a slick boxer, so we don't know how his timing, punch selections, defensive skills, or ring IQ will play out against one, and Fulton just happens to be one of the best.

[just the facts]

Are you of the opinion that Lewis/Holyfield was a draw and not a robbery? Holyfield didn't lose? It's called knowing how to score a fight.

You could have 3 titles at 3 weights and still not be world class. Jorge Arce did that and never beat a single world class fighter. Broner is another one. Having a title isn't a symbol of being world class. It just means you had the fortune to fight a scrub for a world title or got a robbery. Knowing which is which is about standards and having the intellectual ability to understand the difference.

I don't have to try. When it's people like you i'm dealing with, i could be in a deep sleep and still have the rational upper hand. It's you who needs to try harder.

Fulton has to get into a ring with Inoue first. But if he does, don't worry. I'll be here when reality has taken place to see what you have to say.

While you certainly have a point, you personally don’t get to decide who’s world class and who isn’t.

[BenjaminLinus]

Never said he was, I'm just stating a fact, Inoue has never fought a slick boxer, so we don't know how his timing, punch selections, defensive skills, or ring IQ will play out against one, and Fulton just happens to be one of the best.

Okay, I can see your point. But as well, Fulton has never fought anyone like Inoue. Inoue's a complete fighter.

[Sid-Knee]

While you certainly have a point, you personally don’t get to decide who’s world class and who isn’t.

I don't get to decide who's world class. You're right. But i do get to acknowledge who is and who isn't. It's up to the fighter to get wins over world class fighters and prove themselves in that area. It doesn't matter whether they decide to or not. It isn't based on what they want. Everyone doesn't get what they want when they want it just because. They either have the goods to do so or they don't. That is what will decide it. Not the wanting of it.

Figueroa may go on to prove he is such. But he clearly hasn't thus far.

The points still stand until a rational argument has been put forward to argue otherwise.

[just the facts]

I don't get to decide who's world class. You're right. But i do get to acknowledge who is and who isn't. It's up to the fighter to get wins over world class fighters and prove themselves in that area. It doesn't matter whether they decide to or not. It isn't based on what they want. Everyone doesn't get what they want when they want it just because. They either have the goods to do so or they don't. That is what will decide it. Not the wanting of it.

Figueroa may go on to prove he is such. But he clearly hasn't thus far.

The points still stand until a rational argument has been put forward to argue otherwise.

“Acknowledging” who is and who is world class is the same way to say that you and you alone get to decide who’s world class. Get over yourself!

[Sid-Knee]

“Acknowledging” who is and who is world class is the same way to say that you and you alone get to decide who’s world class. Get over yourself!

You're asking me to get over myself because i have the simple ability to acknowledge who is and who isn't world class? If you're incapable of doing something so simple, that's on you. But it is required in everyday life to acknowledge life around them otherwise we're just dunces staring blankly into space. Sorry, but i've evolved.

Offer a counter argument or concede. That is what a debate actually is. It isn't based on what you want or decide it to be, ironically. No, it's based on the merits of your rational argument in return.

[Rebelrbg]

“Acknowledging” who is and who is world class is the same way to say that you and you alone get to decide who’s world class. Get over yourself!

Sometimes, I just let him rant with his belittling, self important responses. Its amusing, he could make a good point, and then destroy it all with a narcissistic whim or ramble.