Is Cotto a better fighter than JMM pound for pound?

[deanrw]

Dean, I have been waiting for you. Who is better P4P?

Jmm 130 vs Cotto 140? I feel both were best at those weights. It is a hard one. JMM on the surface has more fluidity and great timing. Cotto has more tenacity and fantastic timing himself. Jmm has more of a punch arsenal but Cotto's is pretty good also.

I would lean towards jmm, but very slightly. If they were naturally both the same weight it would be a freaking war and I would not want to bet on who the winner would be.

[jazluvr]

Other than PR bias fans and Cotto nutthuggers not one known poster has voted for Cotto, fact.

Oh, so a Cotto fan who doesn't agree with you can't vote in your poll w/o becoming an instant nutthugger??
-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelin Man
JMM is better

There is another fan who is not bias. :boobies:.

But this guy who agrees with you is ok...not a nuthugger. Gotcha.

Ts we all get it already you despise Cotto for "robbing" Clottey

He must be really "unproud" of himself by now, wishing he never started this hate thread disguised as a poll.

[jazluvr]

Look at he guys who voted for Cotto. They all have him in their sigs and avatars and have somehting about PR in their sigs.

So now we can't just be fans? Wow...Bully, give it up. Just admit you hate Cotto. You'll feel better after you let out all that pent up frustration.
You purposly set this thread up to try to discredit Cotto...lol. It's ok, really...we still like you.

[street bully]

Jmm 130 vs Cotto 140? I feel both were best at those weights. It is a hard one. JMM on the surface has more fluidity and great timing. Cotto has more tenacity and fantastic timing himself. Jmm has more of a punch arsenal but Cotto's is pretty good also.

I would lean towards jmm, but very slightly. If they were naturally both the same weight it would be a freaking war and I would not want to bet on who the winner would be.

It would be good for the first 8 rounds IMO, but we all know Cotto tires late, and the last person you can tire late against is JMM. Ask Casamayor and Juan Diaz, Barerra, Juarez and others.

[deanrw]

P4P JMM can fight anyone and be right up there. Cotto at 140 was a relentless beast who pounded opponents for every second of every round.

Nobody should question or underestimate Cotto. He may no longer be the fighter he was. At his best though he was an animal in there.

[deanrw]

It would be good for the first 8 rounds IMO, but we all know Cotto tires late, and the last person you can tire late against is JMM. Ask Casamayor and Juan Diaz, Barerra, Juarez and others.

He has a propensity to tire late now. At 140 he did not have that problem.

[street bully]

He has a propensity to tire late now. At 140 he did not have that problem.

To be fair he only tires against top fighter, but JMM is better than any guy he fought. And if you tire against JMM chances are you will get stopped.

[jazluvr]

He has a propensity to tire late now. At 140 he did not have that problem.

He didn't show much of a problem going 12 rounds with a very tough Clottey with basically one eye either. That was @ 146. Cotto ended that fight with a beautiful left hook right to Clotteys jaw. He's a true warrior.

I tend to agree with your friend Dean... if they were of the same build and natural weight class, i would not bet on who would win either.

[BMWM3P]

To be fair he only tires against top fighter, but JMM is better than any guy he fought. And if you tire against JMM chances are you will get stopped.

So now JMM is better than Mosley also, your blatant ******ity is so amusing to watch.

[street bully]

So now JMM is better than Mosley also, your blatant ******ity is so amusing to watch.

JMM is better than current Mosley, yes. prime for pirime no he isn;t. Wait for me to respond for trying to respond for me.