This rematch clause is completely out of control , why should a fighter have to beat another one twice , automatically ...it's only there to ensure a greedy promoters gets at least two paydays , ask Eddie Hearn at 'rematch room' !
If the first fight is good enough , the public would demand it and it should of course be on the terms of the guy who won the first , isn't that what wining is all about? ....!
If the first fight is good enough , the public would demand it and it should of course be on the terms of the guy who won the first , isn't that what wining is all about? ....!
Comment