Do you have Beterbiev higher than Spence P4P?

[Da Pimper]

Beterbiev has knocked out everyone in his division besides Bivol, Spence has beat everyone in his division except Crawford, who has impressed you more between the two?

[Jacobson]

Close call but going with Beterbiev.

[Dodger07]

Usyk
Inoue
Crawford
Fury
Spence
Bivol
Canelo
Beterbiev
Charlo
Haney

[PRINCEKOOL]

Skill for skill and on achievements? No.

The clear best all around fighters in the boxing game for me are.

Usyk, Spence Junior, Crawford. In no real order, these for me skill for skill are the best fighters.

Then you have the following pack, which includes a whole host of fighters.

Bivol, Alvarez, Lomachenko, Beterbiev, Haney, Fury, Charlo, Inoue, Golovkin.

Note: I would maybe put Tyson Fury at the top of this pack, well if he beats Usyk 'Fury will be at the top of this pack'.

But I still would not rate him as the number 1 best fighter in the world skill for skill. The reason why Usyk is rated so highly.

Is because moving up from Cruiser weight, to beat a solid Elite Super Heavyweight World Champion in Anthony Joshua twice back to back 'Was a impressive physical feat'.

Tyson Fury most impressive physical feat at Heavyweight, are his performances vs Wilder I & II 'I don't think there are many fighters at Heavyweight tactically who can fight Wilder in this manner and win'. But he is out weighing Wilder by 30-40 pounds in those two fights. And Wilder is not a fighter known for his brute strength, Fury has never bulled about the ring another Super Heavyweight 'So this notion that he has monster like strength is over exaggerated'.

Skill for skill the Heavyweight division, although it is my favorite division. It is lacking in complete fighters at the top level. Many top Heavyweights these days, have zero inside game etc.

I did not make a vote.

[Clegg]

Don't have a list but would probably have Spence slightly higher.

[Rockybigblower]

Yes. Spence....like Crawford....is fast becoming the new version of Keith Thurman.