Where are you from? Your written English skills are really poor.
Anyway, the reason the press covers Mayweather is because he is the bigger draw. Not vice versa.
The press covers this because it is a big event. It is not a big event because the press covers it. Why did the press choose not to cover Pac-Cotto? Why?
Don't you think that GBP would have liked to make Hopkins-Jones a big event? But they couldn't.
It is what it is, my friend. Mayweather is just a much bigger commercial draw than the illiterate Pacquiao. The numbers consistently prove that.
Sorry.
Anyway, the reason the press covers Mayweather is because he is the bigger draw. Not vice versa.
The press covers this because it is a big event. It is not a big event because the press covers it. Why did the press choose not to cover Pac-Cotto? Why?
Don't you think that GBP would have liked to make Hopkins-Jones a big event? But they couldn't.
It is what it is, my friend. Mayweather is just a much bigger commercial draw than the illiterate Pacquiao. The numbers consistently prove that.
Sorry.

Comment