Originally posted by flour
View Post
Anyway, the reason the press covers Mayweather is because he is the bigger draw. Not vice versa.
The press covers this because it is a big event. It is not a big event because the press covers it. Why did the press choose not to cover Pac-Cotto? Why?
Don't you think that GBP would have liked to make Hopkins-Jones a big event? But they couldn't.
It is what it is, my friend. Mayweather is just a much bigger commercial draw than the illiterate Pacquiao. The numbers consistently prove that.
Sorry.
Comment