Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson Sued By Woman For Alleged **** In The 1990s

[Oregonian]

Tyson has been accused of ****, sexual assault, sexual harassment, domestic violence, and/or simple assault/battery by no fewer than a dozen women in four different decades and people still think he did nothing wrong. Ridiculous. I hope he dies penniless and unhappy. In his own book he admitted to throwing cinder blocks off the roof of his house at his then-wife because she didn't like the cookies he had baked; the police had to come get him down with a net like a freaking animal. And he told this story happily, as if the woman were the unreasonable one. Scumbag.

———-
Many RICH celebrities have been accused of **** (going back decades) and people think they did nothing wrong. Ridiculous!!!
Amiright?

[Apollo7]

I don't get how some people can be so confident that they know who's telling the truth here. It's very possible that this woman is lying to get some money. It's also very possible that Tyson could have done this.

[Nash out]

Money, money, money, many, money, money, money. Nash out

[Robbie Barrett]

Look at all the clowns attacking a possible **** victim to defend a convicted rapist. Fanboys are ****ing weird.

[Robbie Barrett]

———-
Many RICH celebrities have been accused of **** (going back decades) and people think they did nothing wrong. Ridiculous!!!
Amiright?

Tyson is a convicted rapist.......

[CubanGuyNYC]

I'm a Tyson guy, but I wasn't there and Teddy Atlas has talked about his tendecies to be "aggressive" with girls when he was young, but . . .I gotta say, this trend of women waiting 30, 40 years to make an accusation is some bullshxt.

It reeks of opportunism and there's absolutely no way to prove their case and just ends up being a way to slander & ruin the name of somebody without any proof or evidence.

I just finished reading Tyson’s autobiography Undisputed Truth (which I highly recommend, by the way). He has slept with hundreds, if not thousands of women. The percentage of psychos that are in that mix has to be pretty high — you’re not being too choosy as a celebrity sex addict. It’s a wonder Mike hasn’t been accused and sued by more women. Was he at times aggressive in his approach, or his actions? I don’t doubt it. But ****? That’s a whole ‘nother ball of wax. This woman making allegations decades later, long after the Desiree Washington conviction, no less, doesn’t sound very credible to say the least.

[Oregonian]

Tyson is a convicted rapist.......

———
And Drew Clinton is NOT a convicted rapist despite being an actual rapist . Clinton faced a mandatory 4 year sentence but Judge Robert Adrian threw out the conviction. So he’s not a rapist. Amiright?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nal-cases.html

[Robbie Barrett]

———
And Drew Clinton is NOT a convicted rapist despite being an actual rapist . Clinton faced a mandatory 4 year sentence but Judge Robert Adrian threw out the conviction. So he’s not a rapist. Amiright?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nal-cases.html

Whataboutism is the weakest defence. A convicted rapist is being accused of another **** and the response is to defend the rapist? If this wasn't Tyson would it get this response? Nope. Extreme fanboyism is on display right here. Stop and think, defending a sex offender because you liked his fights is ****ed up.

[Oregonian]

Look at all the clowns attacking a possible **** victim to defend a convicted rapist. Fanboys are ****ing weird.

———-

A judge in Illinois is facing flak for reversing the conviction of an 18-year-old who in October was found guilty of raping a girl at a graduation party in Quincy city.

Adam county judge Robert Adrian paved the way for Drew Clinton’s release after he spent less than five months in jail.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1992394.html

Widespread outrage has erupted over a California judge's decision to give a former Stanford University swimmer a six-month jail sentence for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman. Critics are blasting the decision as far too lenient.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/06/06/us/sexual-assault-brock-turner-stanford/index.html

You most likely defend these two rapists because the justice system prevailed. Amiright? How do you sleep at night defending rapists? Seriously!

[Oregonian]

Whataboutism is the weakest defence. A convicted rapist is being accused of another **** and the response is to defend the rapist? If this wasn't Tyson would it get this response? Nope. Extreme fanboyism is on display right here. Stop and think, defending a sex offender because you liked his fights is ****ed up.

——-
Not a Tyson fan so try again.
As for your “whataboutism” response, I’m taking you on your staunch “convicted rapist” response. The two examples I gave you squashes that legal jargon you’re relying on.

If Tyson is a convicted rapist, then Brock Turner and Drew Clinton are innocent victims of false accusation. Pretty simple.