-
-
'What's with this soft era lol. This is Boxing and people talk sht. Smith didn't call him gay btw he just mentioned how Eubank is never seen with a woman.
I swear this skinny jeans wearing cawk sucking soy boy era disgusts me.'
Why would you even mention it? At least two of the greatest fighters of all time were gay, it is silly to pretend they were not. You can either talk about boxers' sex lives or (my preference) not talk about them.
I hate those magazines that bleat on about the sex lives of celebrities. I don't want to know. I want to know about their boxing lives, nothing else. I don't care if Roberto Duran had sex with a whole herd of goats. I love him as a boxer, I'm not interested in what he did in the bedroom only in what he did in the ring.Comment
-
Don't want to cynical but both declare themselves as wanting more dough from the ppv.
Which is fair enough.Comment
-
'You guys did not see the article about the 2 gay guys raping the adopted kids? If you support any LGBT you are also mentally ill. Takenotes'.
This is what happens when you get your news from Fox News. You become a tool. A tool, in the English sense, meaning a pr1ck, but also a tool, in the more universal sense, being an implement that can be used by its owners. (be in no doubt, if you regularly 'use' Foxnews then Rupert 'owns' you)Comment
-
'Huhhh??? And CNN tells you being a Fruitcake shoving things up your bun is cool and trendy.'
You follow Fox, you probably are delusional. You may be an evangelical, in which case you are certainly delusional. Why would I argue with you? I might as well discuss philosophy with a bus. I have to admire evangelicals, there is something uniquely wrong, but odd, about believing that every word of your translation of a translation of someone else's holy book is literally true. Particularly when the vast majority of the people who's holy book it is, don't think it should be read literally!Comment
Tweet
Comment