Floyd uses Shane's 5 losses as an excuse but..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Easy-E
    Gotta want it
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22686
    • 865
    • 1,739
    • 32,777

    #21
    Originally posted by lparm
    Still doesn't explain the idea that a 5 loss Shane is not a worthy opponent. Especially considering Shane has lost to only 3 men.
    Compared to Pac or Cotto, Shane's age, drawing power and 5 losses put him significantly behind those two

    Comment

    • stefjonno1
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 1180
      • 43
      • 40
      • 17,667

      #22
      Originally posted by Easy-E
      Compared to Pac or Cotto, Shane's age, drawing power and 5 losses put him significantly behind those two


      So does that mean you think its the winner of pac-cotto first, then shane? I could live with that, im sure shane could too. Although i belive floyd will move onto another small guy.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP