Thurman Only Has 1 Loss To Pacquiao And Is Still A Better Win Than Anyone On Crawford's Resume

[Larry the boss]

he is irrelevant and has done nothing to earn a fight with Spence

[GhostofDempsey]

He's better than anyone on Spence's resume too...he beat both of the opponents who were his best wins--Danny and Porter.

[Silence]

Prime for prime Thurman is better fighter than Crawbum. Outpoints his slow a$$.

[BodyBagz]

Well, he dominated the then impressive Ledwaba. Took down the people's champion and ring magazine featherweight champ in Marco Antonio Barrera. He beat Marquez at 130lbs in a close rematch fight but I do think Pac did enough to win that one. He had two dominant wins against Morales. I believe it would of been 3 or at least they wouldn't have gone for 3 matches if Pac had the correct gloves in their first fight as was clearly proven made the difference in the second.

He then fought some lesser guys at the weight as mostly filler fights between the big ones, but those were all very entertaining. Lots of action because he usually fought aggressive opponents similar to himself which made for highly entertaining matchups.

Erik and Marco.....while not ''old'' in actual years, they've been in a ton of wars before Pac got to them.
I'll say it again....they were the perfect Pac opponent.
Easy to hit and not so mobile.

Pac didn't do anything special.

[ELPacman]

Erik and Marco.....while not ''old'' in actual years, they've been in a ton of wars before Pac got to them.
I'll say it again....they were the perfect Pac opponent.
Easy to hit and not so mobile.

Pac didn't do anything special.

*yawn* Did a Filipino steal your girlfriend or something? I'm not sure you can hate any harder, lol.

[BodyBagz]

*yawn* Did a Filipino steal your girlfriend or something? I'm not sure you can hate any harder, lol.

Was that your attempt for swerving the facts ?

That's sad AH

[ELPacman]

Was that your attempt for swerving the facts ?

That's sad AH

No, it's just trying to find out why you so hard on to hate on Pac. Barrera went on to get solid wins following his loss to Pac. Morales went mostly downhill following Pac but he also got wrecked against Pac. Never the same after.

You can use "the perfect opponent" argument for many great fighters. How come they went so long on a streak? Well, it's because he was matched perfectly against X opponent and never fought opponent Y. The facts are that Manny won fights and did so impressively in which he was not picked to.

I ask you to try digging up prediction articles prior to all of Manny's mega fights and they were either 50/50 or 60, even as high as 70 against Pac to win it. Then he went in there and dominated in a manner that baffled the experts. That's what makes history and legends for you.

[BodyBagz]

No, it's just trying to find out why you so hard on to hate on Pac. Barrera went on to get solid wins following his loss to Pac. Morales went mostly downhill following Pac but he also got wrecked against Pac. Never the same after.

You can use "the perfect opponent" argument for many great fighters. How come they went so long on a streak? Well, it's because he was matched perfectly against X opponent and never fought opponent Y. The facts are that Manny won fights and did so impressively in which he was not picked to.

I ask you to try digging up prediction articles prior to all of Manny's mega fights and they were either 50/50 or 60, even as high as 70 against Pac to win it. Then he went in there and dominated in a manner that baffled the experts. That's what makes history and legends for you.

I hate Pac mostly because of his rabid fan base.
They for give (ignore) his BS. And there's a lot of it.
But he smiles and is ''humble''......

You Pac Bois love to criticize May and tear down his reesume.
When anyone dares questions Pac's resume, that person is a hater.

Pac's ''mega'' fights -
Erik ?
Marco ?
Cotto* ?:
DLH* ?
Margarito* ( ) ?

You may be right about the odds aspect.
However....
There can be no mistaking that Pac fought Cotto*, DLH* and Margarito* AT THEIR ABSOLUTE WORSE.

Why is it you think Pac fought Erik, Marco, JMM and Bradley so many times ?!?!?!
EASY FCKING OPPONENTS (stylistically speaking).

What exactly were Pac's DISADVANTAGES vs them ?!?!?
Please, tell me......

[Roadblock]

No, it's just trying to find out why you so hard on to hate on Pac. Barrera went on to get solid wins following his loss to Pac. Morales went mostly downhill following Pac but he also got wrecked against Pac. Never the same after.

You can use "the perfect opponent" argument for many great fighters. How come they went so long on a streak? Well, it's because he was matched perfectly against X opponent and never fought opponent Y. The facts are that Manny won fights and did so impressively in which he was not picked to.

I ask you to try digging up prediction articles prior to all of Manny's mega fights and they were either 50/50 or 60, even as high as 70 against Pac to win it. Then he went in there and dominated in a manner that baffled the experts. That's what makes history and legends for you.

What are you talking about, Manny was the favourite to win in 97% of his fights, only Floyd and Oscar were favourites over him and if they had known Oscar was going to be 20lbs lighter than they thought he would be Manny would have been favourite in that as well, one of the biggest slides in boxing is weight meaning the general public have no idea the full ramifications of weight, even in the Thurman and Ugas fights Manny was betting favourite.

Don't quote what a few fans say the official betting is where the facts are.

[djtmal]

Somebody get these belly aching Floyd Boys a hot water bottle please