Why does Loma get more credit for winning a UD over Campbell (Gold medal winner) than Tank does for stopping Gamboa (Gold medal winner)?

[Hustle]

What don't you understand about the gist of the thread, alt?

Beterbiev is 39. Age has nothing to do with the point of the thread, dummy

And nobody is calling Beterbiev a cherry. But everybody was calling Gamboa a cherry.

See the difference fanboy?

Gamboa was 6 years removed from his last title. Everybody was calling Gamboa a cherry pick for tank pre fight because the whole world knew he best days were gone.

Like I said. Crawford beat a undefeated Gamboa 5 years prior and don't get credit. But tank beating a worse version 5 years later is to be applauded? Keep fanboying goofy.

[BLASTER1]

You made me feel important by paying your hard earn money to see me and complimenting my style

Thank you, sir

Lol. You be a tripper

[Chollo Vista]

And nobody is calling Beterbiev a cherry. But everybody was calling Gamboa a cherry.

See the difference fanboy?

Gamboa was 6 years removed from his last title. Everybody was calling Gamboa a cherry pick for tank pre fight because the whole world knew he best days were gone.

Like I said. Crawford beat a undefeated Gamboa 5 years prior and don't get credit. But tank beating a worse version 5 years later is to be applauded? Keep fanboying goofy.

This dummy is still talking about age

Rigo is older than Gamboa you dumb fcuk

[El_Mero]

The fact the ts even gotta ask is laughable at best

[Combat Talk Radio]

Absolutely no nuance in your posts whatsoever. Gamboa was washed up, had an achilles tear, and it still went 11 rounds. Pedraza is Tank's only credible win - the only top 5 opponent he beat. I don't recall anyone saying it was a bad win. Rigo fight was not held in high regard - even Loma himself said it wasn't meaningful because of the size. Tank was getting outboxed by Santa Cruz who he dragged up in weight. And Rigo is 100% going into the hall of fame. Santa Cruz blatantly ducked Rigo all those years.

Wait a minute - got to call you out here.

Why is it that when Crawford:

• gets outboxed and eye closed by the ghost of Kell Brook,
• gets outjabbed by the ghost of Amir Khan (a 140 lb'er),
• gets damn near taken the full distance by a one-legged Benavidez,
• gets two-pieced, wobbled and dropped by Kavaliauskas,
• drops 6 rounds to a version of Shawn Porter with two bad hips, and
• eats more power punches than ever against a guy in Avanesyan who had already been dominated by Kavaliauskas

is praised because "he knocked them out", but Tank isn't?

Why is it Tank gets criticized for getting outboxed before a knockout but certain other fighters, that's all people care about to justify the fighter, is the outcome?

Why is it the outcome ONLY matters when it's certain fighters?



See, I don't even think it's racism.

It's an unreasonable hatred and bias of PBC.

THAT is what this thread is exposing. Not racism.

[Hustle]

This dummy is still talking about age

Rigo is older than Gamboa you dumb fcuk

Wtf does rigo have to do with Gamboa and Luke Campbell Goofy?

keep deflecting fanboy.

[vaborikua2014]

This is hilarious. Gamboa was a damn good fighter in his prime but by the time he fought Tank he was already years and years removed from his prime. Crawford had beat Gamboa and didn't really get credit why would Tank get any credit for beating a way out of prime version of Gamboa who has not done anything in over 5 years?

[Chollo Vista]

Wtf does rigo have to do with Gamboa and Luke Campbell Goofy?

keep deflecting fanboy.

You haven't comprehended 1 of my posts in the thread

[Chollo Vista]

Wait a minute - got to call you out here.

Why is it that when Crawford:

• gets outboxed and eye closed by the ghost of Kell Brook,
• gets outjabbed by the ghost of Amir Khan (a 140 lb'er),
• gets damn near taken the full distance by a one-legged Benavidez,
• gets two-pieced, wobbled and dropped by Kavaliauskas,
• drops 6 rounds to a version of Shawn Porter with two bad hips, and
• eats more power punches than ever against a guy in Avanesyan who had already been dominated by Kavaliauskas

is praised because "he knocked them out", but Tank isn't?

Why is it Tank gets criticized for getting outboxed before a knockout but certain other fighters, that's all people care about to justify the fighter, is the outcome?

Why is it the outcome ONLY matters when it's certain fighters?



See, I don't even think it's racism.

It's an unreasonable hatred and bias of PBC.

THAT is what this thread is exposing. Not racism.

Until I see Caleb Plant, Stanoious, Crowley, etc getting similar hate, I can't see it

[IronDanHamza]

Gamboa was ranked #2 by the WBA, Davis was #1

https://box.live/fights/davis-vs-gamboa/

I can't find anything that says Campbell was even ranked

I don’t mean ranked by the sanctioning bodies. That’s irrelevant.

I mean ranked by the actual rankings. I’m quite sure he wasn’t ranked.

Campbell definitely was.