Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Warren, Arum Doubt a Fury vs. Usyk Rematch Would Have All The Belts at Stake

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by dan-b View Post
    Don't have a rematch clause, then.
    Yes, no rematch clause. Please.
    dan-b dan-b likes this.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by tokon View Post

      Yes, no rematch clause. Please.
      Mayweather - Pacquiao didn't have one so no reason why this can't.
      thack thack likes this.

      Comment


      • #13
        Since when are Warren and Bob doing rematches?!

        Comment


        • #14
          As long as all of 4 belts on the line the first fight. Then who cares? The real champion will be the winner. Why pay the sanctioning fees on the rematch. Hrgovic & Joyce will be fighting for vacant belts.
          ifc ifc likes this.

          Comment


          • #15
            As long as we get the first fight and see who is undisputed, that’s all that really matters.

            they can vacate some belt after that which might force some other good fights in the division anyway, so it’s not a bad thing.

            The likes of AJ, Wilder, Joyce, Ruiz, Sanchez etc etc should should all be fighting good opposition to get themselves into a position for vacant title fights and hopefully we’ll get to see some of them face off too.

            Comment


            • #16
              Klitschko kept his belts unified and did his mandatories.

              I don't see why the winner of this fight can't do the same.

              Comment


              • #17
                Who gives a flying **** about alphabet belts. The winner will be the true heavyweight champion of the world

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP