How does Crawford at 39-0 compare to Mayweather at 39-0?

[hhh1200]

TC didn't fight those guys he fought B graders, just like today a B grader, Horn a B grader, Indongo B grader, Benevides B grader, TC has not fought and beat one elite level fighter that wasn't about to retire or at the end of the road, is what it is, the top guys today haven't been fighting the top guys, Errol is a little better he beat better versions of the same opponents and a little better quality in his other wins.

Dont wave titles around thinking Im going to be impressed, the tin don't mean much who you beat and when you beat them matters a lot more than the Tin, its not a great era thus far across the board in boxing, though its only 2 years into it, come talk in 2030.

They are all bums. Didn't take them 10 years like the GREAT Spence in the same division for 10 years and still not undisputed b/c he won't fight a guy who dropped his promoter, and came up from 135 (but is far better than mikey garcia who came up from 135) to fight him for undisputed. Nobody is as good as the GREAT Spence with his star-studded resume.

[Roadblock]

They are all bums. Didn't take them 10 years like the GREAT Spence in the same division for 10 years and still not undisputed b/c he won't fight a guy who dropped his promoter, and came up from 135 (but is far better than mikey garcia who came up from 135) to fight him for undisputed. Nobody is as good as the GREAT Spence with his star-studded resume.

Youre talking like a stood-up teenage groupie throwing hate around not a knowledgeable boxing fan.

[hhh1200]

Youre talking like a stood-up teenage groupie throwing hate around not a knowledgeable boxing fan.

As I said, all undisputed are bums to protect Spence who is the one who is not undisputed in the same division for 10 years. End of story.

[Roadblock]

As I said, all undisputed are bums to protect Spence who is the one who is not undisputed in the same division for 10 years. End of story.

As I said you sound like a teenage groupie making over-the-top broad statements that are pure fanboy, undisputed don't mean **** if they are against nobody, Terrence could have fought for a real undisputed title that actually meant something and decided to fight a B grade euro instead, is what it is.

[KingOfGlory]

Mayweather edges him out at 39-0 (many people here forget that Corrales and Hernandez were a big deal at the time) but people also forget the not-so-flashy wins like Postol when it comes to Crawford.

[dan-b]

Youre talking like a stood-up teenage groupie throwing hate around not a knowledgeable boxing fan.

He is a teenage groupie, look at his avatar.

[VG_Addict]

Corrales, Castillo, Judah and Hatton are better than anyone Crawford has fought.

Floyd and Crawford have completely different career trajectories. Floyd won his first world title at 21, in his 18th pro fight, while Crawford didn't win a world title until he was 26, in his 23rd pro fight.

[champion4ever]

It's not even close. Money has fought the very best of his era. It's like counting apples and oranges.

[MusoMeanderings]

As much as Floyd is disliked, Bud's name shouldn't even be in the same sentence with Floyd's.

Terence didn't actively seek the easiest path to undisputed (and it is not easy at elite level anyway), but he was smart to exploit it.

Indongo was a light-hitting unknown who traveled to Moscow to be a fall guy for a protected old home fighter.

Horn? I won't even start.

And then we have Khan who was knocked down by everyone and who quit on a leg shot.

Brook had two bad eyes and almost finished.

Porter got beat bad by Spence before that.

Floyd beating just Hatton and Corrales already trumps that.

[YGriffith]

The problem with today's era is most of these good fighters aren't really big names, and that's due to the unpopularity of boxing, not them being bad.