Pacquiao/Larios was MUCH worse than Mayweather/Marquez
Collapse
-
Second part is complete garbage and a lie.Comment
-
we are arguing about the quality of the win chico. & cotto eating loaded gloves is a speculation until proven otherwise.Comment
-
Morales best weight was really 122, yet its one of pacs signature wins even even though morales had really lost a step by the 3rd barrera fight.
floyd stans act like beating up a blown up LW is floyd's greatest acheivement.... that's what's garbage.Comment
-
...I dont remember reading or seeing any news of pacs US liscense being suspended and the reasons you stated would have had nothing to do with that. explain how he fought erik morales, then larios, then morales a 3rd time if his liscense was revoked due to a promotional dispute, that makes absolutely no sense.
He fought larios to stay busy and that was basically it. And no, marquez would not be retired due to his ability to not get fights, i dont know how long you have followed the sport, but when marquez was fighting guys like victor polo on showtime, he was still getting tv time once in awhile, the idea that he would retire for a reason like that, i think you are playing way to much defense here.
Took roughly a year. Yes Pacquiao fought Larios to stay busy but given the fact that it was fighting Pacquiao in his own backyard the list of possible options were very short and noone really stepped to the plate but Larios. So Larios should get credit where credit is due.
and the whole argument about JMM is inconsequential. Just how i personally viewed the situation.Comment
-
You guys are still throwing paperballs at each other over a couple of tune-ups?
Larios and Marquez were both glorified tune-ups. Marquez for Floyd was more like a rust shaker.
/Thread.Comment
-
even when he fought pacquiao he was still top 2-3 at 130.
larios was just a tuneup.Comment
-
Comment
Comment