Comments Thread For: Referee Carlos Padilla Admits He Helped Pacquiao Win Fight in 2000; Opponent, Family of Ref Respond

[Boxknowledge75]

Juan Diaz, Casamayor, Katsidis, Nate Campbell, Rocky Juarez, Soto, Funeka. Doesn't really matter though, his career was crafted by the most shadiest means possible.

This metric is the win/loss dots from boxrec of Mannys best opponents when he fought them. Look at the placements of the red dots and no, this is very atypical for other fighters.


To put that in perspective, this is Mayweathers.

Those names you mentioned are Taylor made for pac, lol with exception of casmayor. And if he beat casamoyor you would say he was old and you would continue to say that his career is crafted.

people will never be satisfied.
With the Floyd’s, Canelo’s , spence, Crawford, etc… career and accomplishments.

It’s true they could’ve but can’t fight everybody but let’s give them props for who they beat/fought cause not everybody can accomplish what they accomplished.

[champion4ever]

It's not just an article, it's a confession.

What a corrupt scumbag piece of shit he is? Boasting about how he likes fucking with other people's livliehoods.

[HandsofIron]

Boxing and crooks go together like peanut butter and jelly, it's the nature of the beast, wild west. Boxing won't see any major changes until it has some type of governing body/organization like the other sports.

[War Room]

Those names you mentioned are Taylor made for pac, lol with exception of casmayor. And if he beat casamoyor you would say he was old and you would continue to say that his career is crafted.

people will never be satisfied.
With the Floyd’s, Canelo’s , spence, Crawford, etc… career and accomplishments.

It’s true they could’ve but can’t fight everybody but let’s give them props for who they beat/fought cause not everybody can accomplish what they accomplished.

Tailor Made, please let's get on a level playing field here. Depends on when he got Casamayor innit? If they fought him after the Corrales and Castillo loss directly (which is 2 losses the same year in 3 fights) then yes, I would have something to say because of how they positioned Manny to take advantage of a guy who just lost 2x in 1 year.

You don't know that if they're not getting starched the fight or two before. That's the point, he's got those names with one foot on a banana peel and one foot in the grave.

It's not about having a high level of satisfaction, its about corruption and cherrypicking a fighters career. If you can't stand experts like myself exposing this dogeater for what he is, the door is right over there.

It's not about fighting everybody it's about going after fighters when they're hot (giving the fans what they want) and not cracked. Why someone would support this is only explained by this modern day tribal fan phenomenon. Pacquiao can never do wrong is peoples eyes, like yourself.

And look at your namemy guy, boxingknowledge lmao? You should change that to MannyFanny.

What a corrupt scumbag piece of shit he is? Boasting about how he likes fucking with other people's livliehoods.

Laughing and all the bits. Piece of trash!

[Marvin S]

Absolutely disgusting

[JuniorTorres720]

Where the f**k is the same energy for the disgraceful scores from Adelaide Byrd from the 1st GGG/Canelo fight? Let's investigate her instead of wasting time trying to disparage Pacquiao's career.

[Boxknowledge75]

Tailor Made, please let's get on a level playing field here. Depends on when he got Casamayor innit? If they fought him after the Corrales and Castillo loss directly (which is 2 losses the same year in 3 fights) then yes, I would have something to say because of how they positioned Manny to take advantage of a guy who just lost 2x in 1 year.

You don't know that if they're not getting starched the fight or two before. That's the point, he's got those names with one foot on a banana peel and one foot in the grave.

It's not about having a high level of satisfaction, its about corruption and cherrypicking a fighters career. If you can't stand experts like myself exposing this dogeater for what he is, the door is right over there.

It's not about fighting everybody it's about going after fighters when they're hot (giving the fans what they want) and not cracked. Why someone would support this is only explained by this modern day tribal fan phenomenon. Pacquiao can never do wrong is peoples eyes, like yourself.

And look at your namemy guy, boxingknowledge lmao? You should change that to MannyFanny.



Laughing and all the bits. Piece of trash!

Take it easy, my ninja, cuz, blood brother. I could almost see you crying and typing and yes those names you mentioned are Taylor made, they’re slow and they come forward an expert like you should know this. And yes the fighters manny fought may be softened up but the manner of beating they got from manny, they wouldn’t get from other champs in they’re prime.
And remember mr. expert. Great fighters with loses just means they fought better opposition so those big names manny fought were still fighters most fighters won’t beat.
You can go undefeated fighting bums and not become world champion

[Larry the boss]

oh, snap...thats messed up

[Larry the boss]

That Hussein is a b1tch. So Manny had a long count and not a point deducted - that's it?? Same as thousands of fights?? Manny was still winning the fight on scorecards and Hussein had a cut that was not an imaginary cut. Hussein is a b1tch. Have a rematch now with Manny you b1tch.

why are you upset at Hussein? scorecards mean nothing when you are knocked out as Manny clearly was

[Larry the boss]

I can't believe your husband is letting you use the internet unsupervised, miss. Now, Hussein would have lost anyway because he was losing on the cards and he is a fringe level contender. Maybe Pac used peds, but maybe 90% of champions also did in that era...

how would Hussein have lost if Manny was counted out? are you of sound mind?