I have to somewhat disgree. Pac takes risks with his punches but that has been one of his biggest strengths against boxers, they don't expect punches to be delivered they way he does. Floyd has phenominal defense and reflexes but those reflexes are used to blocking the more orthodox punches (as are most boxers) and those 2nd nature movements are damn hard to correct. There ain't beating PBF at his own game (ring smarts/countering) as JMM proved but sometimes the best plan is to follow one's instincts as Pac does.
That's why the thought of this fight interests me so much, they're both the (perhaps) the pinnacle of their craft. PBF is the defensive, intelligent, refined boxer; pac is the offensive, instinctual, unpredictable fighter(not just a brawler anymore).
That's why the thought of this fight interests me so much, they're both the (perhaps) the pinnacle of their craft. PBF is the defensive, intelligent, refined boxer; pac is the offensive, instinctual, unpredictable fighter(not just a brawler anymore).
u brain dead Floyd stans who always bring up Pac has no defense. His defense is mainly his offense. He creates openings based on his constant attacking and feinting. His opponent has no idea if they should block or attempt to punch back because they are in fear of what they are going to get in return. I don't know how often you watch a Pacquiao fight, but if you watch him closely, he has a lot of finer subtle movements that throw his opponent off. Mostly in his body movement which is awkward and the constant feigns he applies early on to confuse his opponent. Pac doesn't need defense like Floyd, when he's constantly on the attack confident in his workrate and power which seems to work out pretty damn good.
just to know whether you genuinely think he has a chance, coming from a balanced Mayweather fan it holds more water.
Comment