Comments Thread For: Conor Benn Relinquishes Boxing License, Charges Upheld By BBBoC
Collapse
-
This means having to endure haters for a little while longer, but Joshua's pro enough to realize it's better to have that, than to get popped in amateur fashion and lose your entire career.
Comment
-
image.png
.................
He has no license so it cannot be suspended now. This is damage control.
He is a cheater and was busted. His team, Hearn included, clearly advised him this was the best route to go.
He'll lay low for a year, clean out his system, pass a couple tests and apply for a license again.Comment
-
No-one picking up on the fact he was charged with misconduct? Defined as behaviour detrimental to the interests of boxing.
I don't think BBBofC can charge him for doping. That's UKAD's job. If UKAD sanction him, the Board would cancel his licence. But how can UKAD charge him? He hasn't failed a UKAD test. UKAD have said they're investigating him - which presumably involves looking at his UKAD tests and determining that this voluntary test by a non-WAD accredited body must have been impacted by low levels of contamination. What other outcome can they come up with? Will they publicly conclude that their own testing is ineffective?
I still think he ends up in the clear, albeit with a PR problem to fix. He'll either be licenced elsewhere, citing unfair treatment by the Board, or he'll challenge the Board's actions and get his licence back.Comment
-
No-one picking up on the fact he was charged with misconduct? Defined as behaviour detrimental to the interests of boxing.
I don't think BBBofC can charge him for doping. That's UKAD's job. If UKAD sanction him, the Board would cancel his licence. But how can UKAD charge him? He hasn't failed a UKAD test. UKAD have said they're investigating him - which presumably involves looking at his UKAD tests and determining that this voluntary test by a non-WAD accredited body must have been impacted by low levels of contamination. What other outcome can they come up with? Will they publicly conclude that their own testing is ineffective?
I still think he ends up in the clear, albeit with a PR problem to fix. He'll either be licenced elsewhere, citing unfair treatment by the Board, or he'll challenge the Board's actions and get his licence back.Comment
-
No-one picking up on the fact he was charged with misconduct? Defined as behaviour detrimental to the interests of boxing.
I don't think BBBofC can charge him for doping. That's UKAD's job. If UKAD sanction him, the Board would cancel his licence. But how can UKAD charge him? He hasn't failed a UKAD test. UKAD have said they're investigating him - which presumably involves looking at his UKAD tests and determining that this voluntary test by a non-WAD accredited body must have been impacted by low levels of contamination. What other outcome can they come up with? Will they publicly conclude that their own testing is ineffective?
I still think he ends up in the clear, albeit with a PR problem to fix. He'll either be licenced elsewhere, citing unfair treatment by the Board, or he'll challenge the Board's actions and get his licence back.
Licence lapsed, and clarifying that the misconduct charge isn't to do with the VADA issue. Also goes on the attack against the Board's actions and claims an independent tribunal will clear him.
Comment
Comment