This is how you score POWER

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cypocryphy
    I DISPUTE YOUR UNDISPUTED
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2020
    • 4698
    • 1,657
    • 1,436
    • 14,834

    #11
    Originally posted by War Room

    You're fucking retarded, literally unreachable. I've given you solid proof and it still won't sink in your rock for brains. You said effective punching, there is NO SUCH THING YOU MONG. Now you've backed off it like you never said it. Admit defeat like a real man. Don't be like some bitch woman jumping to the next thing when you lose.

    Nice try? I copied it from wiki you fucktard. I even gave you the link.​



    You don't win rounds later on from what you did earlier, are you insane?



    The quality of punches is POWER.

    Effectiveness (the effect of the punch) is more important than volume​ that is called POWER and that counts more than the volume of punches.
    It's right there in plain English.

    Volume is for the amateurs, power (or the effect of a single punch) is for the pro's, this is basics! I can't do this, you got something wrong with you. Don't bother responding, I'm not reading. I told you in my last post, bring something or you get nothing.
    200w.gif?cid=82a1493b0a5i4dn7czjw6v9ic2osyi8f796zhx0ia89i2oeh&rid=200w.gif&ct=g.gif


    Oh oh, the first sign you lost this argument you dumb cÚnt is when you start calling people names. For being an English, I find it strange that it's your second language. Maybe I'll try using your primary language, which is re†ard.

    BTW: By your logic, "power" has nothing to do with it since it says nothing but "clean punching." So you're in the business of contradicting yourself and proving your won argument wrong? Brilliant. I don't even have to body you. You do it to yourself. But I'll keep going here because this is both fun and funny ....

    I'm going to spell this out for you REALLY BIG so your PEA BRAIN comprehends what is being said.



    CLEAN PUNCHING-Simply put, fights are won by clean punches landing. Not all punches are created equally. The EFFECT OF THE PUNCH IS VERY IMPORTANT.


    Maybe you should have your boyfriend read that out for you since your illiterate ass is struggling so hard.

    First, this is directly taken from the RULES of the Association of Boxing Commision. It is LITERALLY taken from their website, and unlike you, I didn't prove a broken link, so you can verify it yourself.

    Second, CLEAN PUNCHING is judged just like it says: BY THE EFFECT OF THE PUNCH you moron. If you didn't have SHI† for brains, you'd give up this feeble attempt and winning an argument. You've lost this one just as you've lost every single argument you've ever had with me. Sad but true.

    Third, as you are INCAPABLE of inferring, I will do it for you. The effect of the punch is qualified with "clean punches" because not only are HARD PUNCHES considered (i.e., power) but THE NUMBER of punches are also considered effective:
    effectiveness is more important than volume. However, if, for example, a smaller fighter is landing so much that he’s keeping his larger opponent’s hands at home more of the time, this means the smaller fighter took away the effectiveness of the bigger boxer’s heavier punches.

    EFFECTIVENESS!!! Not ONCE IS THE WORD "POWER" used!!! EFFECTIVENESS!!!

    Patt Russell explained this eloquently and has been a judge since 1984!! He KNOWS what he's talking about. But what are you? Self-proclaimed village idiot. Sad but true.

    Please reply so I can body you six feet into the ground again

    BarrenImmediateBurro-size_restricted.gif

    TOOOOO EASY

    Comment

    • War Room
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2014
      • 9296
      • 2,806
      • 662
      • 19,006

      #12
      Originally posted by FeFist
      If Malignaggi hit someone 40 times and the other fighter landed 4 crisp punches, I am scoring the round to Malignaggi.

      You don't start giving rounds to fighters simply because you reason that they did more damage. It is on them to get the knockdown, break them down, or stop them.
      Define crisp please. Also, does one of those crips punches put his ass on the canvas? You got to clear please.

      I wouldn't use crisp is a synonym for power, but I'll say this ​​​if any of those 4 punches put Paulie stepping into potholes, Paulie loses the round. Paulie landed crazy body punches against Broner and lost the fight. Again, power reigns supreme.

      Getting knocked down gives you an automatic point, this is power.

      Originally posted by juggernaut666

      As a self proclaimed Fury fan you really better watch out using your own criteria .

      Just saying Mr BEST Poster ?

      Go ahead respond back now ,I’m bored .
      You never answered my questions in this thread: https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/b...4#post31589434

      Curious to read your answers.

      Originally posted by juggernaut666
      Haha Fury………it’s actually a shame you can’t be here I just remembered your barred here at least for now……so calling you out is actually a waste of time like most things involving you ……yea I know you read this or will see it your actually the biggest mental midget at 6”9 I’ve ever seen..weak azz minded ,depressed etc…it don’t matter to me the day I LOSE a fight to you I might consider suicide myself ? Who knows right ? Lol
      Who are you talking to? You think you can actually beat Tyson Fury in a fight?

      Originally posted by juggernaut666

      Those Shots end your hero…and with a fractured hand with 2 hours in……I could’ve helped Fury actually years ago with proper punch placement he didn’t learn until 2018 ? Funny you keep posting this and it only shows reading impact…for those who don’t k ow me I had 6 fights with 5 first rnd knockout wins and whatever..lol…this weasel of a poster would Shyte himself if I co fronted him and that’s probably the best bet on here…lol

      Agian if I’m such an easy fight wh6 did he go out of his way to not fight me when he’s fought Lesser fighters …and I’d fight him bare knuckle the Gypsy king right ? Lol
      Are those amateur or pro fights?

      Originally posted by juggernaut666

      Nah I’m not that easy just ask Wlad Klitschko who I knocked out his main sparring partner in NY in 2008 ? Opps you didn’t think that one through did you ? Lol

      And trust me guys like you always end up depressed,I’m untouchable idiot ….I hope you actually shoot yourself your. Waste of air …lol
      I did not know this, who was that exactly?

      Comment

      • Toffee
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2018
        • 7334
        • 2,541
        • 74
        • 62,824

        #13
        Originally posted by War Room

        Define crisp please. Also, does one of those crips punches put his ass on the canvas? You got to clear please.
        You're not going to get definitions. You don't need them.

        As I recall, on a previous thread you argued (I think it was you) that boxing scoring was objective. It's not, it's very subjective.

        And that's why you don't need clearly defined scoring. You need to understand boxing and make your decision.

        And understand how someone else could score differently. Which is why we have more than one judge.

        Comment

        • War Room
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2014
          • 9296
          • 2,806
          • 662
          • 19,006

          #14
          Originally posted by Toffee

          You're not going to get definitions. You don't need them.

          As I recall, on a previous thread you argued (I think it was you) that boxing scoring was objective. It's not, it's very subjective.

          And that's why you don't need clearly defined scoring. You need to understand boxing and make your decision.

          And understand how someone else could score differently. Which is why we have more than one judge.
          Was a responding to you?

          Scoring is dominantly objective. For some reason, you just don't get it and if I remember correctly, you've been losing every echange we've had. Am I wrong?

          The only subjectivity is the mask of corruption or those lacking or without skill, facts!

          What happens when you get a knockdown, you get a point right?

          How is that subjective?

          Power
          If YDKSAB, it can be subjective. If YKSAB, it's objective. Recognizing the effect of power takes a lot of skill. Some lesser skilled judges might be like: Oh that didn't hurt him and a real judge will say yes that hurt.

          Clean Punching
          You land a punch in the scoring zone, you're scoring. This is objective, the punch lands, blocked, or misses. If you have a hard time seeing punches landing, you can call on subjectivity, but at the end of the day if a punch lands, it lands and if you don't have the eyes for it, that's a you problem.

          Effective Aggressivness
          Oscar vs Floyd, clear case of ineffective aggression from Oscar. Floyd was making Oscar miss and making him pay. If you're aggressive and being effective (landing shots), this criteria is being scored in your favor. Oscar vs Tito, effective aggression from Oscar. Making him miss and making him pay. Being aggressive and landing is effective aggressiveness. It's crystal clear my guy.

          Ring Generalship
          Controlling the ring. Taking center, setting traps, cutting off the ring. This is objective, clearly.

          Defense
          You're either making a man miss or not, am I right lol? Cleary objective.
          Last edited by War Room; 10-09-2022, 08:42 PM.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP