WTF with the P4P List? Marquez #5, Mosley #3?

[Silencers]

Bull ****!!!!!!!

WTF has Hoplyfield done in the last 3 years?

Mosley is 1-1 at WW since 2007, how the **** is he the #1 WW?

he is 2-1 and he wasnt ranked P4P, ut now he is #3, ****outtahere with that bull****!!!!!!!

Actually it's pretty simple why he's the number 1 welterweight. Cotto vs Margarito was to determine who the number 1 welterweight was, Cotto lost (dubious wraps or not, he lost), Mosley then beat Margarito which makes him the best welterweight and leapfrogged Cotto.

Cotto was dropped out of the top 10 by the Ring because of his loss to Margarito then the Ring thought there were more deserving guys to be in the top 10 because Cotto only had fought Michael Jennings after the Margarito fight, he got put back into the top 10 after the Clottey fight whereas Mosley had been in there because he had beaten Margarito and rightfully so because Margarito was ranked in the top 10 when Mosley beat him. I think he got put in at number 5, which is fine because Vazquez and Rafael Marquez had long layoffs and in Vazquez' case hasn't fought at all until next month, Hopkins has been out of the ring for over a year so he got dropped a spot and JMM just lost. So I have no problems with it.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Actually it's pretty simple why he's the number 1 welterweight. Cotto vs Margarito was to determine who the number 1 welterweight was, Cotto lost (dubious wraps or not, he lost), Mosley then beat Margarito which makes him the best welterweight and leapfrogged Cotto.

Cotto was dropped out of the top 10 by the Ring because of his loss to Margarito then the Ring thought there were more deserving guys to be in the top 10 because Cotto only had fought Michael Jennings after the Margarito fight, he got put back into the top 10 after the Clottey fight whereas Mosley had been in there because he had beaten Margarito and rightfully so because Margarito was ranked in the top 10 when Mosley beat him. I think he got put in at number 5, which is fine because Vazquez and Rafael Marquez had long layoffs and in Vazquez' case hasn't fought at all until next month, Hopkins has been out of the ring for over a year so he got dropped a spot and JMM just lost. So I have no problems with it.

First You dont get a guys ranking on a division just because you beat him.

Second how can you say, is right to dropped MArquez and Vazquez because of their layoff, but say is OK for Mosley to there, and the dude has not fought in 9 months. Double standars?

Cotto was ranked at #7 after he beat Jennings, Mosley was raked at #6, Cotto beat Clottey and got dropped to #9. How can you explain that to me? i dont say, because people think Cotto lost, because the ring have him winning the fight!!!!!

Plus Cotto have the W over Mosley!!!!!

This ran kings are all wrong and Cotto should be higher P4P and WW wise over Mosley!!!!

[Silencers]

First You dont get a guys ranking on a division just because you beat him.

Second how can you say, is right to dropped MArquez and Vazquez because of their layoff, but say is OK for Mosley to there, and the dude has not fought in 9 months. Double standars?

Cotto was ranked at #7 after he beat Jennings, Mosley was raked at #6, Cotto beat Clottey and got dropped to #9. How can you explain that to me? i dont say, because people think Cotto lost, because the ring have him winning the fight!!!!!

Plus Cotto have the W over Mosley!!!!!

This ran kings are all wrong and Cotto should be higher P4P and WW wise over Mosley!!!!

Yes, you do. That's how the Ring operates and I think it's right, the man who beats the man is the man.

Well Marquez and Vazquez were out of the ring since March 2008, a year and a half, if they weren't in those brutal fights, they probably wouldn't be in the top 10 altogether, Mosley has been out of the ring since January.

Cotto was dropped out of the top 10 after Jennings, he has only been on the pound for pound list for 4 months.

He has a win over Mosley in 2007, almost 2 years ago, things change in 2 years.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Yes, you do. That's how the Ring operates and I think it's right, the man who beats the man is the man.

Well Marquez and Vazquez were out of the ring since March 2008, a year and a half, if they weren't in those brutal fights, they probably wouldn't be in the top 10 altogether, Mosley has been out of the ring since January.

Cotto was dropped out of the top 10 after Jennings, he has only been on the pound for pound list for 4 months.

He has a win over Mosley in 2007, almost 2 years ago, things change in 2 years.

1. Thats wrong because styles makes fights. the body of work should be looked at too, not just a single win!!!!! Thats why you got Cotto beating Mosley, Mosley beating Margarito and Margarito eating Cotto.

2. Well Mosley has been away 9 months and if it wasnt for his win over Margo, he would of been a nobody right now.

3. Cotto out of the top 10 after he lost to Margarito he got put back in when he beat Jennings. And then he got dropped down 2 spots for beating Clottey!

Having Mosley over Cotto in either ranking is all wrong!!!!