Comments Thread For: British Boxing Board of Control Won't Allow Eubank-Benn Bout To Move Forward
Collapse
-
-
The initial test was in August. Why the hell haven't they conducted a confirmation test on the B sample yet, given the economic and social magnitude of this fight? The subsequent clear test is meaningless, as Benn could already have gained a significant advantage by then (despite the "experts" claiming this drug wouldn't give an advantage). Its a testosterone altering hormone, morons! Which is why it's banned! Duh!
Comment
-
The B sample can only be used to clear an athlete. It cannot be used as further evidence of guilt because if it tests different than the A sample the whole test procedure is voided
Whyte elected to have his case heard by a tribunal on the basis of the A sample alone - plus evidence from VADA - without waiting for his B sample to be tested. Any athlete has the right to do that. When the tribunal came down in Whyte's favour UKAD withdrew their charge and the B sample was no longer relevant. Like I said, it can only be used to clear the athlete. What's the point of testing it if he's already been cleared?Last edited by kafkod; 10-05-2022, 11:12 AM.Comment
-
-
Let the fight go ahead with condition if Benn wins, result dont stand and wont be on Eubanks or Connors Boxrec and wikipediaComment
-
Comment
-
Here come the dumb new names that include a banned substance for him forever. Calling all goobers, you are up!Comment
-
Comment