Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: British Boxing Board of Control Won't Allow Eubank-Benn Bout To Move Forward

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by The Devil Knows Boxing View Post

    Hey what a shocker, the Boxingscene Idiot doesn't understand Boxing.
    You are incapable of intelligent thought let alone how to make a valid point.

    You’re NSBs village idiot/liar/coward.

    Comment


    • So he failed VADA’s tests and yet passed UKAD’s tests. Is there a difference in how the two drug testing agencies test?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Toffee View Post
        I'm not going to slate Benn yet - he's entitled to due process.

        But this fight can't possibly go ahead as things stand. If Eubank wants to fight and something happens to him then I say he's a big boy making his own decisions. But it would be a disaster for boxing which is bigger than just Eubank.

        And again we see the problems with the sport having no real overarching governance.
        ​​​​​​
        That's another odd thing? If he was popped back in August how come they didn't test the B sample right away? And now they won't have those results in time if the fight goes on...

        If the fight gets canceled can Benn sue VADA if he's clean? Fkn with someone's career here.

        VADA coming off like amateurs

        Comment


        • VADA supposed to be the Gold Standard of testing really ***ed this all up. Should of already had the B sample tested as soon as first one failed. What sht get lost in an email???

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Cash in View Post
            Can they not do a Haye vs Chisora and get Luxembourg to licence it? Cash in
            Why do you need BBoC supervision again? Isn't this so that you have supervisors to observe change room rules with wraps and the admin. of drugs and the same for the corners?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
              VADA supposed to be the Gold Standard of testing really ***ed this all up. Should of already had the B sample tested as soon as first one failed. What sht get lost in an email???
              B sample will say exactly the same.

              Benn's defence won't even contemplate the B sample and I doubt it will ever see the light of day.

              They will argue about the tests he passed and how the timing means he couldn't possibly have been on steroids.

              The people who do this aren't ******. Big name fighters can afford the kind of people that VADA and UKAD can't. They made a slight miscalculation this time but they'll have built enough wiggle room into their timing.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Toffee View Post

                B sample will say exactly the same.

                Benn's defence won't even contemplate the B sample and I doubt it will ever see the light of day.

                They will argue about the tests he passed and how the timing means he couldn't possibly have been on steroids.

                The people who do this aren't ******. Big name fighters can afford the kind of people that VADA and UKAD can't. They made a slight miscalculation this time but they'll have built enough wiggle room into their timing.
                And 99% of the time u are right. And now that you bring that up I'm pretty sure the boxer has to ask for the b sample to be tested when told A failed?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post

                  And 99% of the time u are right. And now that you bring that up I'm pretty sure the boxer has to ask for the b sample to be tested when told A failed?
                  I think so. Or they can waive their right to have it tested.

                  Either way, the whole "test the B sample" catchcry isn't really a thing. It just rules out contamination during testing, which doesn't really happen.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by JuniorTorres720 View Post
                    Cheaters are never going to admit wrong doing. We've seen it recently from Canelo and Oscar Valdez. I was rooting for Benn but after this BS, I'm going with Eubank!
                    Didn't the California Athletic Commission allow Valdez to defend his title even after he was popped ?

                    It was a similar thing to this situation where he was popped with a week to go before his fight???

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post

                      And 99% of the time u are right. And now that you bring that up I'm pretty sure the boxer has to ask for the b sample to be tested when told A failed?
                      Negative. I believe it was Big Baby who basically said F it on a B sample once.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP