Comments Thread For: Hearn Tears Into Wilder, Says He Is Not Hall of Fame Worthy: 'Frightening That He's Saying That'

[Jab jab boom]

You did defend Wilder. You even agree with Eddie that Wilder isn't a HOF'er. But instead of claiming so or ignoring the thread, you took aim at Eddie and AJ instead. You said it was "Hypocrisy". How? He never once claimed AJ was a HOF'er, nor did he promote him as one. Give me a single example where he did this?

It seems with Eddie being rational and telling the truth, you got a bit emotional. Strange, as you agree with him.

This article was based on Eddie’s comments, so I pointed out the irony of how in this article, he’s talking about wilder overrating himself yet he’s sold you dumbass Brits Aj as if he was the next great thing. And like the sucker you are, you bought into it. You’ve dedicated a large portion of your life sucking Ajs nutsack which is why you’re mad now. So again Sidney, point out my comment where I defended Wilder you euro chump with a b***h name.

oh and if you want to know an example of Hearn promoting Joshua as if he were great, have you forgotten when he listed Aj in his top 10 list of greatest heavyweights ever and initially said he was the greatest hw ever? Lmaoooo
https://www.dazn.com/en-US/news/amp/...d1ntxsbyph8c4o

[Sid-Knee]

This article was based on Eddie’s comments, so I pointed out the irony of how in this article, he’s talking about wilder overrating himself yet he’s sold you dumbass Brits Aj as if he was the next great thing. And like the sucker you are, you bought into it. You’ve dedicated a large portion of your life sucking Ajs nutsack which is why you’re mad now. So again Sidney, point out my comment where I defended Wilder you euro chump with a b***h name.

oh and if you want to know an example of Hearn promoting Joshua as if he were great, have you forgotten when he listed Aj in his top 10 list of greatest heavyweights ever and initially said he was the greatest hw ever? Lmaoooo
https://www.dazn.com/en-US/news/amp/...d1ntxsbyph8c4o

Eddie was joking about AJ being the greatest ever. Do you really believe he was serious? Haha.

We're talking about HOF here. Eddie has never called him a HOF'er. You think he did but haven't got a single time he said so.

Bowe, Frazier, Foreman, Liston are not HOF worthy. But they appear in his top 10. It doesn't mean he considers them to be ATG's though.

Getting defensive when Eddie made a comment you agree with is defending Wilder. Hell, your delusion even thinks Wilder should be in the HOF if Naz is in there. Naz is an actual great fighter with a great resume over plenty of world class fighters. Where in the world do you get the idea that a nobody without a single world class win is basically level with a fighter with many?

[Jack_sh*t]

But ur a racist tho

Thanks. And you're a plant-pot.

[Jab jab boom]

Eddie was joking about AJ being the greatest ever. Do you really believe he was serious? Haha.

We're talking about HOF here. Eddie has never called him a HOF'er. You think he did but haven't got a single time he said so.

Bowe, Frazier, Foreman, Liston are not HOF worthy. But they appear in his top 10. It doesn't mean he considers them to be ATG's though.

Getting defensive when Eddie made a comment you agree with is defending Wilder. Hell, your delusion even thinks Wilder should be in the HOF if Naz is in there. Naz is an actual great fighter with a great resume over plenty of world class fighters. Where in the world do you get the idea that a nobody without a single world class win is basically level with a fighter with many?

You literally went full ret@rd with the bolded comment to try and make a point you’re desperate and failing to make. Those guys ARE hall of famers regardless of your irrelevant opinion and I can’t even believe you tried to include Frazier and foreman in that statemen yet you defend Naz who faced one elite fighter and got his ass dominated? Lololol
On hearns list he didn’t even include guys like Larry Holmes or Marciano or even Klitchko but had Joshua on it? gtfoh. You asked for an example of Hearn over rating and over selling Aj and I gave you a perfect one. Take a page out of Ajs book and just quit because like him, you’re clearly over matched.

[Sid-Knee]

You literally went full ret@rd with the bolded comment to try and make a point you’re desperate and failing to make. Those guys ARE hall of famers regardless of your irrelevant opinion and I can’t even believe you tried to include Frazier and foreman in that statemen yet you defend Naz who faced one elite fighter and got his ass dominated? Lololol
On hearns list he didn’t even include guys like Larry Holmes or Marciano or even Klitchko but had Joshua on it? gtfoh. You asked for an example of Hearn over rating and over selling Aj and I gave you a perfect one. Take a page out of Ajs book and just quit because like him, you’re clearly over matched.

None of those i listed are worthy of HOF. Their resumes are too thin. It's also hilarious that fighters like Frazier and Foreman who had very little talent are propped up by you, but a seriously talented fighter like Naz isn't. They were brawlers. Foreman was dominated by Jimmy Young also in his prime and walked away from the sport. He was only around for 5 minutes. Naz dominated the very best for over 5 years and made 15 defences. To suggest he only faced 1 elite fighter is insane. Outside of Ali, who were the elites Frazier beat? If he didn't beat a single one (He didn't) then Ali was beaten by a low skilled brawler who was beaten by the worst cave man ever to exist in the heavyweight division in Bonavena. But got the robbery decision. Who are the elites that Norton beat outside of Ali? Yet he beat Ali all 3 times but getting robbed in 2 of those fights. At least Ali admits he lost one of those two fights. Ali lost to Young and Shavers, but again got the robbery. In fact, who the hell did Ali beat that is actually elite? I'd like to hear it.

You said he was promoted as a HOF'er. He wasn't. But you're changing your wording now because you couldn't prove your comments. That's the thing with a fragile ego.

I left it off the last comment on purpose to see if you'd change direction and not f3ck yourself over again. But no, you still stand by it. AJ wasn't put in the top 10 you idiot. The two last places were open for Fury, AJ and Usyk. So you're wrong again.

Now tell me again how AJ only had people watching him due to having an inferiority complex towards Americans. Who were they supposed to have this against? Wilder? Haha. What is the difference between AJ and any other British fighter over the last 100 years or more? Do tell. I'm dying to know.

[Jab jab boom]

None of those i listed are worthy of HOF. Their resumes are too thin. It's also hilarious that fighters like Frazier and Foreman who had very little talent are propped up by you, but a seriously talented fighter like Naz isn't. They were brawlers. Foreman was dominated by Jimmy Young also in his prime and walked away from the sport. He was only around for 5 minutes. Naz dominated the very best for over 5 years and made 15 defences. To suggest he only faced 1 elite fighter is insane. Outside of Ali, who were the elites Frazier beat? If he didn't beat a single one (He didn't) then Ali was beaten by a low skilled brawler who was beaten by the worst cave man ever to exist in the heavyweight division in Bonavena. But got the robbery decision. Who are the elites that Norton beat outside of Ali? Yet he beat Ali all 3 times but getting robbed in 2 of those fights. At least Ali admits he lost one of those two fights. Ali lost to Young and Shavers, but again got the robbery. In fact, who the hell did Ali beat that is actually elite? I'd like to hear it.

You said he was promoted as a HOF'er. He wasn't. But you're changing your wording now because you couldn't prove your comments. That's the thing with a fragile ego.

I left it off the last comment on purpose to see if you'd change direction and not f3ck yourself over again. But no, you still stand by it. AJ wasn't put in the top 10 you idiot. The two last places were open for Fury, AJ and Usyk. So you're wrong again.

Now tell me again how AJ only had people watching him due to having an inferiority complex towards Americans. Who were they supposed to have this against? Wilder? Haha. What is the difference between AJ and any other British fighter over the last 100 years or more? Do tell. I'm dying to know.

I’m not reading that whole sh**. You trying to argue that foreman and Frazier don’t belong in the hof but naz does is the dumbest sh** I’ve ever read on this site. And that includes the most absurd sh** I’ve read from pac and canelo fans. Take a seat sir, you are not worthy of debating boxing with me. Please start a thread on this site making that point. I’d love watching your euro trash self get obliterated by every Fan who actually knows boxing.

[Sid-Knee]

I’m not reading that whole sh**. You trying to argue that foreman and Frazier don’t belong in the hof but naz does is the dumbest sh** I’ve ever read on this site. And that includes the most absurd sh** I’ve read from pac and canelo fans. Take a seat sir, you are not worthy of debating boxing with me. Please start a thread on this site making that point. I’d love watching your euro trash self get obliterated by every Fan who actually knows boxing.

You're not reading it, but you read it to know what i supposedly said? You're still the same special level of moron aren't you. Still with the deflections because you know what happens. You're a coward without conviction. A deluded idiot i dominate without even trying. Instead of backing up what you say, you try every trick in the book to run away and not get into it about the mad shlt you come out with.

We'll leave the Naz, Foreman and Frazier talk alone for a while. We'll get back to it, but i want you to answer to some of your other comments.

Tell me again how AJ only had people watching him due to having an inferiority complex towards Americans. Who were they supposed to have this against? Wilder? Haha. What is the difference between AJ and any other British fighter over the last 100 years or more? Do tell. I'm dying to know.

[Gideon lock]

Eddie even says he doesn't think AJ is a HOF'er right now.

But it is funny it seems to irk people like you when it's pointed out that Wilder is very delusional and isn't close to being on the HOF.

I have no horse in the race I'm British not exactly obsessed with deontay. Its just clear to see hearn trying to discredit a fighter who would obliterate his best heavyweight fighter. Go and watch wrestling sid vicious probably more to your liking.

[Sid-Knee]

I have no horse in the race I'm British not exactly obsessed with deontay. Its just clear to see hearn trying to discredit a fighter who would obliterate his best heavyweight fighter. Go and watch wrestling sid vicious probably more to your liking.

You believe a coward and a bum would destroy a world class fighter that he's repeatedly ran away from? Sorry, but that makes no sense. Then you add in the fact that Wilder has never beaten a single world class fighter in his life to up the level of hilarity.

You believe Eddie pointing out that Wilder isn't a HOF'er is discrediting him? So you believe that he is? Because saying he isn't can only be discrediting him if what Eddie says isn't true. It is. It couldn't be any more true if he tried. Wilder is a very delusional person. To think he has any credibility is to think with the same delusional mindset. Then you add in the many people Wilder has slandered and defamed. You won't find a more poisonous person out there who discredits all those who threaten or beat him.

"I'm not exactly obsessed with Deontay" Strange comment to say the least. Who said you were? Seems to me you let a bit of information out you probably didn't want to. You're definitely a fan.

I should watch wrestling because i pointed out that it irks people with Eddie saying Wilder is nowhere near close to being in the hall? I'm sorry, what???? Do you think that makes any sense? It's ironic too. Wrestling when watched by adults can only be by those who are dim. It's fake and ******. But going by your capabilities to rationalize, it seems wrestling is right up your street.

Are you sure you're British? You sound exactly like an American. Or maybe you've been here far too long and are now subjugated. Take some time off from here fella. You look as though you need to. Like, seriously

[Sid-Knee]

You literally went full ret@rd with the bolded comment to try and make a point you’re desperate and failing to make. Those guys ARE hall of famers regardless of your irrelevant opinion and I can’t even believe you tried to include Frazier and foreman in that statemen yet you defend Naz who faced one elite fighter and got his ass dominated? Lololol
On hearns list he didn’t even include guys like Larry Holmes or Marciano or even Klitchko but had Joshua on it? gtfoh. You asked for an example of Hearn over rating and over selling Aj and I gave you a perfect one. Take a page out of Ajs book and just quit because like him, you’re clearly over matched.

Have you run away again from a question about your comments? I'll ask it again.

Tell me again how AJ only had people watching him due to having an inferiority complex towards Americans. Who were they supposed to have this against? Wilder? Haha. What is the difference between AJ and any other British fighter over the last 100 years or more? Do tell. I'm dying to know.