mayweather masterfully potshotted on the backfoot alot. eleminating
jmm having anything to counter to. and making juan initiate instead of countering.
which led to floyd counterpunching
I am aware of what it's called as well, and I never said Floyd invented it. I simply said it was one of his signature defensive moves which he uses.
Pacquiao negates no reach advantage. He's never fought anyone with the reach of Mayweather, so he has never negated it before. We don't really know at this point, but Marquez was able to land at will against Pacquiao, which he couldn't do against Mayweather.
Morales -- 72
De la hoya -- 73
Pbf -- 72
He has negated it before. Don't think he will not reach Pbf if they do fight.
mayweather masterfully potshotted on the backfoot alot. eleminating
jmm having anything to counter to. and making juan initiate instead of countering.
which led to floyd counterpunching
+1..
have read it from page 1 and this is the most logical of all the post..
as if PBF is always on offense for JMM to counter.. PBF focuses a lot on defense rather than KOing the lil guy in front of him..
Morales whooped Pacquiao, then got dominated by Raheem. Clearly shot.
Well, you asked a question... I answered. If you can question those wins, then do not be offended when people question pbf win against jmm. But base on odds alone ( I know they are not accurate ),
pbf - jmm == 4 is to 1
dlh - pac == 4 is to 1 , then change to 2 is to 1 prior fight night.
pac - hat == 2 is to 1
minus hindsight, you can tell who's performance should be given more props... my own personal opinion.
Well, you asked a question... I answered. If you can question those wins, then do not be offended when people question pbf win against jmm. But base on odds alone ( I know they are not accurate ),
pbf - jmm == 4 is to 1
dlh - pac == 4 is to 1 , then change to 2 is to 1 prior fight night.
pac - hat == 2 is to 1
minus hindsight, you can tell who's performance should be given more props... my own personal opinion.
Comment