Comments Thread For: Eddie Hearn Breaks Down The Latest on Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Eddie Hearn Breaks Down The Latest on Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua

    Eddie Hearn says he is working on the assumption that the fight between Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua will go ahead, even though he still has a plan B if it all falls through.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Boxing 112
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2022
    • 1848
    • 800
    • 167
    • 0

    #2
    This social media and interviews back forth getting boring. This fight is not happening 100% both teams just playing along for the public but they know both their fighters will fight someone else. I expect Fury vs Charr. AJ vs Zhang. Then hopefully Fury Usyk first quarter of 2023. I think that is actually realistic. AJ Fury next Wilder Usyk next aint realistic and wont happen

    Comment

    • filup79
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 2603
      • 208
      • 2
      • 32,882

      #3
      What the point with AJ always or Hearn fighters always gotta have a rematch in order to fight them? AJ ain't giving any fighters rematches when he beats them. All it does is gives fights we don't need and holds up bigger fights

      Comment

      • greeneye99
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2017
        • 3470
        • 733
        • 4,974
        • 23,666

        #4
        Originally posted by filup79
        What the point with AJ always or Hearn fighters always gotta have a rematch in order to fight them? AJ ain't giving any fighters rematches when he beats them. All it does is gives fights we don't need and holds up bigger fights
        It's Not just Hearn's Fighters...
        You think Wilder didn't have a rematch clause in the Fury 2nd fight?
        You think Fury doesn't have a rematch clause in all his Title defenses?
        Sheesh

        Comment

        • TMLT87
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2020
          • 6289
          • 1,841
          • 913
          • 27,292

          #5
          Originally posted by Boxing 112
          I expect Fury vs Charr. AJ vs Zhang.
          Lol geez, can you imagine....

          Yeah, that kind of BS wouldnt be surprising though.

          Comment

          • Hustle
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2020
            • 3027
            • 1,374
            • 1,885
            • 4,044

            #6
            Originally posted by Boxing 112
            This social media and interviews back forth getting boring. This fight is not happening 100% both teams just playing along for the public but they know both their fighters will fight someone else. I expect Fury vs Charr. AJ vs Zhang. Then hopefully Fury Usyk first quarter of 2023. I think that is actually realistic. AJ Fury next Wilder Usyk next aint realistic and wont happen
            Usyk is a promotional free agent. If he wants to fight wilder next then it's happening

            Comment

            • JayCho
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • May 2013
              • 665
              • 139
              • 39
              • 14,826

              #7
              Originally posted by greeneye99

              It's Not just Hearn's Fighters...
              You think Wilder didn't have a rematch clause in the Fury 2nd fight?
              You think Fury doesn't have a rematch clause in all his Title defenses?
              Sheesh
              All Hearn did was try to negotiate the split in the rematch to 60/40 for AJ

              That means there was already a rematch clause in the offer from Fury!!!

              Comment

              • Alexis67
                Journeyman
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Aug 2022
                • 150
                • 91
                • 357
                • 0

                #8
                Who cares about Fury-Joshua... Usyk wants to fight Wilder-Helenius winner

                Stay updated with exclusive boxing news, fighter rankings, match analysis, and upcoming fight schedules. Your trusted source for professional boxing since 1922

                Comment

                • nixxter
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2017
                  • 306
                  • 98
                  • 72
                  • 18,136

                  #9
                  Originally posted by filup79
                  What the point with AJ always or Hearn fighters always gotta have a rematch in order to fight them? AJ ain't giving any fighters rematches when he beats them. All it does is gives fights we don't need and holds up bigger fights
                  AJ doesn't have a rematch clause, Fury does and it's a 50/50 split in the rematch. If Fury wins there is no second fight.

                  The A side usually has a rematch clause, it's not just AJ or Hearn fighters.
                  For example, Joyce has a rematch clause against Parker.

                  Comment

                  • Bob
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2019
                    • 2130
                    • 1,096
                    • 1,886
                    • 28,232

                    #10
                    Originally posted by greeneye99

                    It's Not just Hearn's Fighters...
                    You think Wilder didn't have a rematch clause in the Fury 2nd fight?
                    You think Fury doesn't have a rematch clause in all his Title defenses?
                    Sheesh
                    He didn't for Whyte.
                    They shouldn't exist at all for mandatories but they now call them gentleman's agreements. Pathetic.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP