Comments Thread For: Eddie Hearn Breaks Down The Latest on Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua

[Bob]

AJ doesn't have a rematch clause, Fury does and it's a 50/50 split in the rematch. If Fury wins there is no second fight.

The A side usually has a rematch clause, it's not just AJ or Hearn fighters.
For example, Joyce has a rematch clause against Parker.

Finally someone else who reads all the report's & understands.

[LAchargers373]

LMAO. Read the fine print. Not happening without DAZN. Str8 out of hearns mouth. “We accepted all terms I don’t anticipate any issue with an agreement between DAZN and bt sport” that’s a joke. BR sport not letting fury fight on DAZN neither will ESPN and DAZN ain’t letting their ambassador get knocked out on another platform. Fast Eddie Hearn BSing everyone as usual

[Liondw]

With the social media acceptance of the fight from Joshua, can only look good for him.

If the fight doesn't happen, then Fury gets criticised, because he called AJ out, and all terms have been accepted.

[tokon]

This fight is not happening 100% both teams just playing along for the public but they know both their fighters will fight someone else. I expect Fury vs Charr. AJ vs Zhang.

Much more likely but Zhang, if he performs like the Hrgovic fight, is a dangerous fight for Joshua.

[Dakuwaqa]

Bs fight

Fury should be fighting Usyk and AJ should be getting some winnable fights as he’s come off back to back defeats and

[greeneye99]

He didn't for Whyte.
They shouldn't exist at all for mandatories but they now call them gentleman's agreements. Pathetic.

Wow
That's one Tyson Title defense Fight........
Ya'll Anti Hearn Guys act like it's only AJ that has rematch clauses
Smh