People are talkin like Pacquiao already beat Cotto

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fightingfigs
    Undisputed Champion
    • May 2008
    • 4287
    • 298
    • 236
    • 10,618

    #41
    Originally posted by go1nbanana
    i bet you **** on your pants last saturday and lost a quite sum of money, not mentioning losing your face to shame
    Nah I enjoyed it live at athe MGM grand instead of spankin it to PPV like you guys. Great fight. I give my props to Pacquiao, he is the real deal.

    He passed the ultimate test. Mayweather doesnt stand a chance.

    .

    Comment

    • MaD RoBoT
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 3892
      • 664
      • 362
      • 17,466

      #42
      if you could've just be more objective bout it instead of bein fanboyish

      then it'll be easier for you to swallow your own crap

      Comment

      • Chups
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2004
        • 18400
        • 1,835
        • 1,281
        • 52,879

        #43
        Originally posted by fightingfigs
        On top of that Cottos punch power has been feared by all his opponents.
        A flyweight just took it and smiled.

        Comment

        • fightingfigs
          Undisputed Champion
          • May 2008
          • 4287
          • 298
          • 236
          • 10,618

          #44
          Originally posted by MaD vEiN
          if you could've just be more objective bout it instead of bein fanboyish

          then it'll be easier for you to swallow your own crap
          I was objective I felt the only way Pacquiao could win was by decision. It probably wouldve went to just that if Bayless hadnt uneccessarily stopped it. I mean Cotto was still punching and defending, just dancing and boxing instad of ****ing.

          Was it wrong to say that Pacquiao was counting his chickens too early before they hatch? Not really, Cotto is a venerable opponent. I mean things couldve changed if he had a good corner, pacquiao now has a ruptured ear drum and two black eyes.

          Roach and his team were talkin way more smack than Miguel Cottos team.

          Comment

          • fightingfigs
            Undisputed Champion
            • May 2008
            • 4287
            • 298
            • 236
            • 10,618

            #45
            Originally posted by Chups
            A flyweight just took it and smiled.
            No hes a legitimate welter, and I highly doubt he smiled. Two black eyes bruised cheeck bones and blood coming out of your ears doesnt constitute for smiles,

            I heard he did 2 songs at the Mandalay Bay for his concert and then went to the hospital.

            He can take one hell of a shot though.

            Pacquiao did what most welterweights couldnt do, withstand Miguel Cottos punches and deliver harder back. Pacquiao isnt just any old Flyweight, hes a phenom. Cotto has a 68 or so percent KO ratio.

            Comment

            • master_bates
              your puppet and clown
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 83
              • 7
              • 6
              • 10,479

              #46
              Originally posted by zeidrich
              pls dont compare mayweather to cotto, its a disgrace to mayweathers name.

              Mayweather is the best defensive fighter at the moment, cotto is the opposite.
              Mayweather is one of the fastest boxer at the moment, cotto is the opposite.
              Mayweather relies on speed, single shot, footwork, cotto is the opposite

              the only thing they have in common is the jab, but cotto got a slow jab while mayweather got a lightning fast jab
              o they also have one more thing in common the o? In floyd and cotto

              ghfghfghgjk'fojhfghokgohikfoghkfghgh

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP